You think forbidding homosexual marriage or gays in the military, is authoritarian? or conservative?
It looks like your answer is “authoritarian”, you are pushing liberalism and starting a new anti-conservative attack by labeling conservatism “authoritarian”.
You lefties come at conservatism from all kinds of angles, using all kinds of vocabularies, in all kinds of mediums, and on all kinds of forums, even conservative ones have people working the left’s angle (with adjusted language of course).
But you all have the same end goal.
PLEASE HELP ME by showing me, cut and paste if that's what it takes -- what is liberal or anti-conservative in my post?
I'm not fighting with you, I am genuinely confused. Please be specific, I'm not fighting with you, I honestly want to know.
For the record, I think it is impossible for homosexuals to be married, so automatically any "marriage" between homosexuals is false, law or no law. A law stating that marriage is ONLY between man and woman, is fine with me -- in my mind, it's already there. So in that regard, I am for law "forbidding" homosexual marriage in that, too bad so sad, marriage is off limits for them. Does that ease your mind?
Do you think there should be laws forbidding two guys from a private ceremony where they pretend to get married? Do you think there should be laws forbidding a baker from baking their cake?
Also for the record ... yes, I think that would be authoritarian on a federal/national level, though if a state wanted to try to pull it off, more power to it.
WERE there ever laws forbidding gays in the military? If so, then what was Don't Ask Don't Tell?????????