Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
Why Mitt Romney did not pound this issue to death in the debates will always be a puzzle to me... It was a winner but Romney kept mum on it.

I think he was gun shy because of previous criticism that he was going off half-cocked before all the facts were in. I know that doesn't really apply to Benghazi but it's apparent to me that gentleman Romney wanted to give the lying POTUS the benefit of any doubts and thought he (Romney) could gain some credit for his fairness.He, instead, should have gone for "the one's" jugular.

15 posted on 01/14/2014 7:26:21 AM PST by luvbach1 (We are finished)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: luvbach1

Gentleman? The way he treated the republicans in the primary? He mowed them down, outspent them ridiculously. And we knew he’d wimp out against Obama. And he did

No one wants to see that again. No one in their right mind is going to out up with such a RNC pick any more


20 posted on 01/14/2014 7:34:21 AM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: luvbach1
A walk down Memory Lane. The Internet never forgets. A couple of FR threads regarding Crowley and the presidential debate:

The Candy-Obama Controversy: 'Get the Transcript'

Re: 2nd debate: Was “get the transcript Candy” a pre-arranged and scripted setup?


21 posted on 01/14/2014 7:41:48 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson