Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/14/2014 12:42:02 PM PST by LonelyCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: LonelyCon

Just do it anyway.

Make them enforce their ruling.


2 posted on 01/14/2014 12:44:10 PM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonelyCon

F**k you and your little 10th Amendment.

We’re your government and you’ll do what we say and like it...


3 posted on 01/14/2014 12:46:53 PM PST by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonelyCon
What is he in jail for again, liberals, a dirty office?
4 posted on 01/14/2014 12:47:06 PM PST by Phillyred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonelyCon

And then there is John Roberts who so wanted children (white ones) that he arranged to get them from South America.

I wonder what he’s thinking today.


5 posted on 01/14/2014 12:50:32 PM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonelyCon

I am fairly certain the overwhelming majority of Americans, from all generations, do not feel that 5 weeks is unreasonable in this case. Yes, far, far better for abortions to never exist at all but in this case it shows how the Supreme Court is out of touch with over 90 % of Americans.


6 posted on 01/14/2014 12:51:46 PM PST by freedom462
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LonelyCon; All
When the Supreme Court decided the case of Minor v. Happersett, it clarified that the 14th Amendment applied only those rights which the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect to the states.
“3. The right of suffrage was not necessarily one of the privileges or immunities of citizenship before the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, and that amendment does not add to these privileges and immunities. It simply furnishes additional guaranty for the protection of such as the citizen already had.” —Minor v. Happersett, 1874.

But since the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect the so-called right to have an abortion, the activist justices who decided Roe v. Wade had no enumerated abortion right to apply to the states and wrongly legislated the so-called right to an abortion from the bench instead.

Sadly, these justices got away with doing this because parents have not been making sure that their children are being taught the simple rules for interpretating the Constitution as the Founding States had intended for it to be understood.

11 posted on 01/14/2014 1:43:14 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson