Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Putin: Gays must 'leave children in peace'
My Fox DC ^ | 01/17/2014

Posted on 01/17/2014 7:53:12 AM PST by Responsibility2nd

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: Responsibility2nd

It WAS a nice backhand remark!


41 posted on 01/17/2014 11:49:12 AM PST by SgtHooper (If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

hes a nationalist that looks out for his own country, i dont see how that makes him a bad person. infact it seems to me hes a good person, he hates obama as well but he had a good relationship with george bush.


42 posted on 01/18/2014 2:30:18 AM PST by The Right wing Infidel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

I hope so. Wonder why Duck Dynasty premiered at 25% less than last year.


43 posted on 01/18/2014 3:18:20 AM PST by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Seriously? Barf.


44 posted on 01/18/2014 3:19:25 AM PST by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Don’t think they’ll be rainbow flags, since Russia illegalized them, & the competitors aren’t allowed. Oops: forgot about homos who want to make a homosexual point. Maybe they’ll be arrested (here’s hoping).


45 posted on 01/18/2014 3:23:30 AM PST by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ancient Wonderboy

Do you have a link on the 35% of pedophiles are homos (I use homo because google tells me it’s an insult).


46 posted on 01/18/2014 3:28:04 AM PST by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: The Right wing Infidel

Another reason to like Putin.


47 posted on 01/18/2014 3:30:49 AM PST by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: The Right wing Infidel
You may have a point there.

But he still is backing Iran and seems to have never shed his obsession with cutting the U.S. down to size.

Of course, it is tough to tell if he wants to reduce the U.S. role because of the sewer pipe from Hollywood or something else more sinister.

Gorbachev had a good relationship with Ronald Reagan also, but that did not make him a good person; just a realistic person who knew which type of man to respect.

48 posted on 01/18/2014 5:26:17 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

Putin is a bad man, but at least he is a man.


49 posted on 01/18/2014 5:30:47 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
No argument from me. I'm also convinced that he is not a thoroughly bad man. Wish I could say the same about our POTUS pretender.
50 posted on 01/18/2014 7:24:14 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
"No argument from me. I'm also convinced that he is not a thoroughly bad man. Wish I could say the same about our POTUS pretender."

Putin is interesting from a philosophical/theological standpoint. Traditional morals and values, while perhaps difficult to always adhere to, are also very pragmatic. As somebody noted on another thread I read some time ago, STDs could be eliminated within one or two generations of complete monogamy. Traditional nuclear families guard against poverty and delinquency, etc.

In that light, I think Putin, while not a particularly moral person, recognizes the practical values of public virtue and acts in accords with them primarily to advance his own interests, but in doing so, advances many of the interests of his countrymen. all this raises the question, "Are virtuous actions done for the wrong reasons still moral?"

To a (much) lesser degree I noted some of the same phenomenon with Clinton. Clinton was certainly in the presidency to advance his own interests, but there were occasions where as president, his interests and those of the nation overlapped and he was forced to do or say the right thing (i.e., welfare reform, his "sister souljah" moment, etc.). He did so purely for the most cynical, calculated reasons, but they generated positive effects.

51 posted on 01/18/2014 7:35:44 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson