[South40]

Let me spell it out for you. The numerical one in a thread is part of the original post that created the thread. How do you propose to ever "get in before" the poster who created the thread? You can't. The number two post in a thread is always the first response in a thread.

You apparently feel so compelled to play the part of agitator that you are willing to make a fool of yourself to do so. Have at it. The fact remains, you could not "get in before" number one when number one is part pf the original poster's creation of the thread. Your argument is senseless, but that's not uncommon for agitators like yourself. So be it.

Bye.

[gitmo]

Maybe he thinks it's a zero-based array, like in C#. Post 0 would be the first, 1 would be the second.

[1rudeboy]

Neither of you appear to be familiar with internet memes. And there’s nothing wrong with that . . . my original comment was directed toward neither of you, either.

[BwanaNdege]

You wrote to 1rudeboy, "You apparently feel so compelled to play the part of agitator".

1rudeboy's "About" page says only this: No, I do not respect you. You spend far too much time here.

You appear to have properly categorized him.