I never cease to be amazed by the willingness of Libtards to fully illustrate the fact that they are complete and total MORONS. It’s like they are very proud of their lack of intelligence.
Someone as laughably uninformed about firearms has no business making policy regarding their possession and use. I would not even allow someone that ignorant to handle one until he/she had been taught the basics.
I suppose on one level we should thank him - he and others like him offer us tremendous opportunities. We can quite easily hold him up as an example of the woefully uninformed. This can lead to real education about firearms and their use. When people have the facts, not emotional agenda-driven drivel, they realize gun control is a terrible idea.
I am looking at my Bushmaster right now.
It is just sitting there. It’s not killing anyone. I am waiting for it to get up, drive my truck to the mall and start blasting everyone.
It must be tired, its not doing anything.
The author shows his own illiteracy. A semi automatic firing off 15 rounds per second? That is some quick finger pulling.
This author is not showing much gun knowledge. AK-47s and variants are 30cal and hold 30 rounds.
Obviously, he must have been referring to this:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKlnMwuCZso
If you’re going to criticize someone’s terminology, you’d better get it right yourself. “peaked” should be “piqued”.
And to afficionados, clip is not the same thing as magazine, but clip has been used for magazine in writings fiction and non-fiction alike forever in the last century, regardless of its accuracy, such that it’s almost been interchangeable. It’s a shame that it has done so, but that has almost become acceptable usage. I’m not saying I agree with it, but it’s almost trite to keep complaining about that as a far-fetched mis-use of the term.
Now as far as the rest of the article, I’ll give the author credit. .30 caliber magazine? That’s pretty bad! The rate of fire is certainly a misrepresentation. My AR 15 can’t come near to firing at the rate that the elected official claims it can be fired at.
So to start off the argument using clip and magazine as the initial talking points denigrates the discussion. That is the least meaningful part of the discussion and causes the argument to lose the impact it otherwise would have.
Every time gun owners in this country seek more freedom, the statist anti’s always catch up, and try to take it away. ALWAYS. It may take them a few years — I’ve had unfinished receivers since 2009 — but they eventually get around to laws limiting these newfound freedoms.
“piqued”, not “peaked”
If you’re gonna harp on magazine v. clip and throw around the accusation of illiteracy, it doesn’t look good.
What we need is safer bullets
Lib: These assault weapons are only good for killing large numbers of people.
Me: Is that why the police carry them? So they can kill large numbers of people?
Lib: (crickets, crickets)
Be thankful that once the magazine clippy thingies are fired, they’ll be all used up.
Although Kalifornia already has three separate assault weapons laws, I'm sure the anti-gunners would welcome some more. Soon it will be sufficient for the gun to be black in order to be outlawed.