Not that I know of. I didn't mean to imply their was. Certainly he's better than Lankford who I would (as others have) compare to his "mentor" Tom Cole (not that Cole is Stalin as a few people seem to think). It's just that I see nothing particularly "right with him", a freshman US Rep., to elevate him over Shannon and justify some of the more aggressive endorsements I've seen.
So I'm wondering which blog or "tea party group" or radio talk show host that people put so much stock in is feeding people their opinions of him. It feels like one of those situations to me. His Grace, Mark Levin?
Levin and the Senate Conservatives Fund have given Bridenstine their seal of approval, and I don’t see any reason why he’d be undeserving of it. He’s been a solid conservative in the House, and I can’t name an issue he’s weak on
Shannon I don’t know enough about, but all I’ve heard is good. As long as OK sends one of these two to the senate, I’ll be happy.
So long as the Paulistinians aren’t the ones pushing Bridenstine (and they’re not—I checked), we’re good.
From what I’ve read about Bridenstine, he is *not* a Paultard, and if L. Ron Paul decides to endorse Bridenstine because he agrees with him on certain issues I won’t hold it against Bridenstine (just as I wouldn’t hold it against Shannon if Ron Paul or Mitch McConnell decide to jump on his bandwagon).