Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The New Debt Ceiling Deadline Is Going To Be Earlier Than We Thought
Business Insider ^ | Jan 22, 2014 | Brett LoGiurato

Posted on 01/23/2014 12:15:55 PM PST by Brown Deer

The U.S. is likely to exhaust its borrowing authority on the earlier side of what Treasury Secretary Jack Lew had estimated, he said in a letter to Congressional leaders on Wednesday.

Lew warned in the new letter that Congress will likely need to raise the debt ceiling by late February to avoid a potential default on the country's obligations.

As part of the bill to reopen the government in mid-October, the debt limit was suspended through Feb. 7. The Treasury can use so-called "extraordinary measures" after that point to keep borrowing and paying the nation's bills for a few weeks thereafter.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: debt; debtceiling; default; lew; treasury
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Brown Deer

Picking up speed on the road to ruin.


21 posted on 01/23/2014 12:37:08 PM PST by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

“That number seems low.”

Well yeah but add a few trillion here and a few trillion there, now we are talking about some real debt — But in the end it is no different than pissing your pants in a blizzard, oh sure, you feel all warm at first, but then you realize that you just screwed yourself.


22 posted on 01/23/2014 12:40:51 PM PST by areukiddingme1 (areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

That’s about right.

According to the White House’s Office of Management and Budget, during his eight fiscal years, Bush ran up a total of $3.283 trillion in deficit. When 0bama took office, the national debt stood at $10.626 trillion. It is now at $17.341 trillion in only 5 years.

So Bush ran up the debt from $7.343 trillion to $10.626 trillion in his eight years. It is still a disgrace, but about the right amount.


23 posted on 01/23/2014 12:41:10 PM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

Go ahead. Run up the debt faster, and do the Fed “tapering” thing at the same time. See what happens. Bond investors, this is going to be interesting.


24 posted on 01/23/2014 12:43:42 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theoria
That number seems low.

Compared to what 0bama has done, it certainly does. But it didn't seem low when it happened!
25 posted on 01/23/2014 12:50:00 PM PST by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt
Perhaps the amount in deficit is correct, however the national debt went up from 5.7 Trillion to 10.6 Trillion under Bush.

The bottom line is you can't trust the R's and D's to control spending.

26 posted on 01/23/2014 12:50:35 PM PST by Theoria (End Socialism : No more GOP and Dem candidates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer
The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government can't pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government's reckless fiscal policies.

Senator Barry Soetoro 2006

27 posted on 01/23/2014 1:00:54 PM PST by Veggie Todd (I don't always talk to Obama voters, but when I do I ask for Large Fries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Ooof! That’s great!


28 posted on 01/23/2014 1:10:56 PM PST by Irenic (The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheelbarrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

Dear Mr.Lew,
I do have to point out that nobody elected you.In your capacity as an adviser we shall take note of your request.However,it is the House that determines national spending, not the Senate,nor the Presidency nor the Treasury.
Each member is answerable to their constituents whose views are taken notice off especially in such a serious issue.
We shall address the situation during the current session at an appropriate time.Meanwhile please be aware that fiscal prudence must be observed until you hear further from the House.

John (got some) Boenher

Ah! dream on.


29 posted on 01/23/2014 1:12:31 PM PST by managusta (The first sign of maturity is the discovery that the volume knob also turns to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar
Isn’t this the freebie limit increase they gave Obama? If the House won’t agree, he can unilaterally raise it using provisions of the last agreement?

That's what I understood as well, which makes this topic moot. Lew's letter is to put political pressure on Boehner, so that Obama won't be forced to take political responsibility for the debt limit increase.

I thought the only way to prevent a Presidential increase would be for both Houses to overrule Obama. I can't find the language. Maybe I'm looking in the wrong statute.

30 posted on 01/23/2014 1:14:14 PM PST by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Looking in my crystal ball I see a train heading for a broken bridge... and accelerating.


31 posted on 01/23/2014 1:15:15 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

Banker-masters of new world order had their minion, Jack Lew, deliver their cue for the banking-captive Congress to keep adding to dollars owed by taxpayers to the banksters.

Of course, the government has no need to borrow dollars when it can create dollars.

By why spend a trillion into the economy and NOT OWE it to banksters when you can spend a trillion into the economy and OWE it to banksters ?


32 posted on 01/23/2014 1:16:04 PM PST by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Agreed, Vince. There was value in the fight, last time, but the pubbies caved.
And, there is great value in this fight upcoming, as well. The pubbies, though, don’t have the stones, IMO, for the fight, and Boner will cave, yet again.

For me? Shut it down. The routine cash flows are more than adequate to fund the debt service, and most of the real and necessary functions of fedgov.


33 posted on 01/23/2014 1:21:38 PM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2016; I pray we make it that long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PubliusMM

If we don’t continue to fight, people will think it is fixed. If the debt is a problem at 16 trilliion, it is a problem at 17, and a problem at 19. If we stop fighting at 19, then people will doubt it is a real problem or a manufactured crisis we made up.


34 posted on 01/23/2014 2:00:59 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson