Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Law Puts Gloves On California Bartenders
NPR ^ | 1/26/14 | Sam H. Sanders

Posted on 01/26/2014 10:16:50 AM PST by Drango

Bartender Cameron Hall hadn't heard of a new California law that bans culinary workers from touching uncooked food with their bare hands.

The rule applies to bartenders, who are now supposed to wear gloves to put limes in the mojitos and cherries in the Manhattans — even to scoop ice into a glass.

But when a reporter fills him in, Hall stops serving drinks at Rocco's Tavern, a little spot in downtown Culver City, just long enough to rant.

"It'd just be a pain," he says. "It'd be a nuisance. I'm gonna start making my customers wear gloves, in opposition!"

Hall says the law is unnecessary, as his bar is always on guard, ready for an unannounced food inspector to drop in, keeping up with multiple health and safety codes already on the books.

It's not just the nuisance of the gloves, he says. It's how they will change the art of bartending.

What would be the hardest thing to do with gloves on? Hall answers, "Shake hands."

California Assemblyman Richard Pan, a Democrat who heads the committee that introduced the glove rule, says the law is not that onerous.

For starters, Pan says the law was written after conversations between lawmakers, health officials and some of the establishments that would have to abide by the rule.

"The purpose of the law was not to force everyone to wear gloves, as much as to ensure that we have cleanliness and food safety in restaurants," he says.

Pan says regulators are still figuring out how they'll enforce the law. For the first six months, no one will be punished for not wearing gloves. They'll just get warnings.

Also, restaurants and bars can apply for exemptions to the rule if they adhere to strict training requirements and written guidelines.

Pan does admit, gloves can't fix all food safety issues.

"I think that we should keep our food clean and safe," he says. "That doesn't always mean wearing gloves. A glove by itself does not magically make everything clean."

Since the law passed, a change.org petition was launched to exempt bartenders from the glove rule. In just a few days, it got over 5,000 signatures.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Drango

Sex-fetish elbow-length latex gloves, preferably in day-glo light green, are very California. At least one person in every bar should wear a pair. The bartender is the most visible person. It should be him.


21 posted on 01/26/2014 12:40:58 PM PST by Thud (Tthis is federal criminal extortion under 18 USC 1951, and Racketeering under 18 USC 1961. All of Co)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

Repave a road in California? WHERE?


22 posted on 01/26/2014 12:42:09 PM PST by Thud (Tthis is federal criminal extortion under 18 USC 1951, and Racketeering under 18 USC 1961. All of Co)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

I have heard that more germs are transferred wearing gloves than without. Seems counterintuitive but it had to do with holes pierced in gloves, perspiration buildup, and not cleaning them they way you would frequently wash your hands.


23 posted on 01/26/2014 12:48:18 PM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Drango

I notice my bartender leaves his gloves on as he heads to bathroom and is still wearing them as he returns.

Did you wash hands after using thee restroom? I ask.

Don’t need to I got these gloves on, he says.

I get a soda, no ice.


24 posted on 01/26/2014 12:53:11 PM PST by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thud

Highway 20 in northern Florida. It was already perfect, having been recently paved. It’s smoother and blacker than it was, but it was a huge waste of money. I’m guessing it was funding they had to use or lose.


25 posted on 01/26/2014 12:57:29 PM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

It’s getting a little scary, isn’t it? Sometimes you have to laugh, though, if for no other reason than to keep your sanity. (figurative “you” not you, personally)


26 posted on 01/26/2014 1:29:35 PM PST by KGeorge (Till we're together again, Gypsy girl. May 28, 1998- June 3, 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

Thanks. You live in Florida. I haven’t seen repaved roads in California for years, save for road-widening projects.


27 posted on 01/26/2014 2:36:32 PM PST by Thud (Tthis is federal criminal extortion under 18 USC 1951, and Racketeering under 18 USC 1961. All of Co)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: KGeorge

A little.


28 posted on 01/26/2014 5:02:38 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; me = independent conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Drango
"I'm gonna start making my customers wear gloves, in opposition!"..."

Guy's got a real knack for business...

29 posted on 01/26/2014 7:33:19 PM PST by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias... "Barack": Allah's current ally...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson