Except folks in your camp NEVER address that stuff until you are cornered and forced to deal with it.
So what? Well, you obviously wouldn't know...
Could that have taken place without open trade with Communist China?
Yes.
Well, I hate to be the one to break this to you, but China demands copies of the patents and the complete plans for manufacturing before it will allow our corportations to manufacture on its soil.
I hate to be the one to break this to you, but that doesn't change the fact that I'm against the transfer of sensitive technology to China.
Except our trade with China can't take place without it, and you support our open trade with China. Now why don't you sit there for a moment and try to figure out how you trapped yourself yet again.
Did I mention tariffs?
You're whining about free trade, that means low or no tariffs.
The answer is no. I did not bring up the subject of tariffs or advocate for raising or lowering them. There are other ways to impact trade.
You claimed I view job displacement in the US as a great thing. Where? If I need to express that again and again for you, just let me know. You seem to be having a bit of a comprehension problem.
I mention the 23% of our workers out of work and you tell me there's no need to review our trade policies. So either you're lying about your blindness when it comes to the need for a review of our trade policies, or you're lying about actually caring about our displaced workers. Which is it?
Well that tariff discussion you're having with yourself is certainly interesting to watch.
Not as interesting as your poor grasp of English and your confusion between incentive and disincentive.
What is particularly amusing here, is that whichever word is used, the use of it reveals your agreement that the government moves corporate policy via tax manipulation. Thanks for admitting the concept is sound and in play.
And now you act offended because I have called you on the fact you still favor Free Trade
I'm not offended by your calling me out because I favor less government interference with trade.
I am offended by your lies about me.
You probably are. Nevermind if I have lied about you or not. And the sad thing is you should really be offended by your own slander of your intellect here through your actions.
Baloney.
The answer is no. I did not bring up the subject of tariffs or advocate for raising or lowering them. There are other ways to impact trade.
By all means, elaborate.
You claimed I view job displacement in the US as a great thing. Where? If I need to express that again and again for you, just let me know. You seem to be having a bit of a comprehension problem.
I mention the 23% of our workers out of work and you tell me there's no need to review our trade policies.
So you lied when you claimed I view job displacement in the US as a great thing.
What is particularly amusing here, is that whichever word is used, the use of it reveals your agreement that the government moves corporate policy via tax manipulation.
Where did I disagree that high taxes impact corporate policy?
I am offended by your lies about me.
You probably are.
I am.
Nevermind if I have lied about you or not.
You made a claim about me. If you have proof, show it.
If you can't, admit you lied.