Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CorporateStepsister

Interesting question. I’m more inclined to say, “Yes, it should be,” than “No,” but that’s assuming that “impeachable offense” means anything.


43 posted on 01/28/2014 12:41:09 PM PST by Tax-chick (You just keep on trying 'til you run out of cake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick

Thing is, that First Ladies have no business having an agenda that requires the President’s signature. Women in America have the ability to do their own thing without permission of a man and frankly Michelle’s lunch program antics have done nothing but damage. Why can’t First Ladies concentrate on fashion (like Jackie O. did) or being a good hostess or simply making life better for the President? Cripes, there are a lot of things a First Lady can do without meddling in politics.


44 posted on 01/28/2014 1:14:27 PM PST by CorporateStepsister (I am NOT going to force a man to make my dreams come true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson