Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: William Tell

But that’s a manufacturer problem. I’m not saying the PURCHASER could buy his lock somewhere else, I’m saying the FFL could purchase them from gun owners and then sell them as legally required the next time someone bought a gun (though this would require the mfgrs to stop including them, but that’s just an issue between the manufacturers and their FFL customers).


35 posted on 01/28/2014 10:43:23 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Still Thinking
Still Thinking said: "I’m saying the FFL could purchase them from gun owners and then sell them as legally required the next time someone bought a gun ..."

I understood you.

The dealer is not permitted to release a handgun unless he is also including a newly manufactured lock. He is not permitted to purchase a "used" lock from a gun owner and satisfy the requirement with such lock.

This is why many gun owners in Kalifornia also own a bag of worthless locks.

Long guns do not have to include a lock if the purchaser signs an affidavit which attests to ownership of a Kalifornia approved gun safe. I don't believe that the affidavit is effective for hangun sales.

42 posted on 01/28/2014 1:28:25 PM PST by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson