Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FAA Stops Beer Drone Delivery
BREITBART ^ | 30 Jan 2014 | ELIZABETH SHELD

Posted on 01/30/2014 11:59:11 AM PST by MeshugeMikey

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 last
To: MeshugeMikey

Video on the lifting capacity of hexacopters:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dNpA60eyiQ


101 posted on 01/30/2014 7:09:27 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

About as much as any other commercial product.

If we have an RTCA, what do we need and FCC for?


102 posted on 01/30/2014 7:26:05 PM PST by Dead Corpse (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

To provide the link to the law. RTCA is a bridge organization between industry and FAA. Industry wants to minimize costs. FAA wants to hold the line on safety. Somewhere in the middle is an acceptable middle ground.

If there is no liability due to meeting legal guidance for the performance and safety of an airplane, nobody would be able to fly commercially - the insurance would be disastrous.


103 posted on 01/30/2014 7:48:48 PM PST by MortMan (Is a delayed shower a "stay of exablution"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

The insurance would be what the market dictated. Just like for everything else. As would liability.


104 posted on 01/30/2014 8:00:09 PM PST by Dead Corpse (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
The insurance would be what the market dictated. Just like for everything else. As would liability.

The risk of designing and building airplanes would no longer be manageable. With aircraft that hold 200 to 300 passengers (and some larger), the liability on the aircraft manufacturer would make it prohibitive to build aircraft in the US for commercial use.

Small aircraft inherently entail less risk. That market might survive, but I doubt it.

When you enter the area of operations, there are additional mines to be avoided if the direct tie to the law is eliminated.

I suspect we will disagree on this subject, FRiend. I appreciate a civil discourse, and hope I have provided the same.

105 posted on 01/30/2014 8:35:03 PM PST by MortMan (Is a delayed shower a "stay of exablution"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: null and void

yes, I do along the Kissimmee river from Sebring to the big lake.
Also along the shores of the big lake as ell as when spotting pigs


106 posted on 01/31/2014 2:19:33 AM PST by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) obammy lied and lied and lied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey

I fly from ground level to 20,000feet with my plane thanks.


107 posted on 01/31/2014 2:22:25 AM PST by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) obammy lied and lied and lied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

For RC planes, you aren’t supposed to fly over 400 feet or within vicinity of an airport without permission.

Maybe this brewery is near an airport?


108 posted on 01/31/2014 6:00:56 AM PST by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

id bet there would be very scant few beer drones at those upper altitudes!


109 posted on 01/31/2014 6:16:51 AM PST by MeshugeMikey ("When you meet the unbelievers, strike at their necks..." -- Qur'an 47:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: MortMan
The risk of designing and building airplanes would no longer be manageable.

Why is this being assumed? If anything, innovation would lead to better reliability. Especially as barriers to market entry would be lowered or outright eliminated.

The "law", or some random FAA reg, is no assurance of product quality or reliability. Why should "just following orders" indemnify you?

I really think this could work. Civil aviation is on life support, according to some. We're choking on so many Federal regulations, and not just in this industry, that it's no wonder we're stagnating.

I suspect we will disagree on this subject, FRiend. I appreciate a civil discourse, and hope I have provided the same.

Probably. But I hope I've at least given you something to ponder. Freedom is kinda messy, but it's better than the alternative. ;-)

FReegards...

Privatize the FAA from Cato.

Privatize ATC, also from Cato

FAA barriers to certain markets from GPO.gov

Recent purposed legislation

Drone related

110 posted on 01/31/2014 7:50:28 AM PST by Dead Corpse (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: All

Ice fishers in Minnesota are reeling from a recent FAA decision prohibiting beer delivery by drone.

I'd trade some beer for some fresh Walleyes.

111 posted on 02/01/2014 5:12:34 AM PST by McGruff (I'm a Conservative. Not necessarily a Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
Not the FAA but our masters can and will shutdown cup cake makers

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3117126/posts

Not stealing the thread just providing another example of govt aholes killing commerce and entrepreneur's

112 posted on 02/01/2014 5:22:35 AM PST by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: IncPen

A thinking citizen might think that govt was out to kill any innovation in money making


113 posted on 02/01/2014 5:24:03 AM PST by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nailbiter

Cruel and unusual to deny a man his beer.


114 posted on 02/01/2014 10:00:13 PM PST by IncPen (When you start talking about what we 'should' have, you've made the case for the Second Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey
I don't know the current status of an earlier related case, but maybe the judge's decision is good news for the company indicated by the following link.
FAA Stops Beer Drone Delivery

115 posted on 03/07/2014 4:02:00 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Sorry, I posted my previous post in the wrong thread.


116 posted on 03/07/2014 4:03:28 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

Glad you pinged me here. Now that the judge ruled against the FAA, the industry can continue.


117 posted on 03/07/2014 4:28:20 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson