Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stanne

Stanne, overreact much?

Thankfully you’ve pulled out the last insult in your quiver, misogynist.

Does it ever occur to you that there is no word that describes the hatred of men in this fashion?

Think about that. Nobody took the time to develop a word that references misogynist like action against men.

Why do you think that is?

Is it because only men can be haters?
Is it because women thought there needed to be a word like this for actions against them.
Is it because men simply don’t operate on a level where they feel the need to dismiss actions based on the concept negative things said about them would have to be broad enough to cover all men?
Could it be that women are so fragile, that they needed a word men didn’t?
Could it be that women are so shallow, that they can’t deal with rejection, criticism, and the daily strife men do without having to be so petty?

Thanks in advance for the “reasoned” answers I’m sure will come.


44 posted on 02/02/2014 11:18:20 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Amnesty is job NONE! It isn't even the leading issue with Hipanics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

My husband, and his friends, rightfully refer to them as, “manhaters”.

Distinguishable from the icky Miss Davis by her willingness to get close to men in order to extract money from them, AKA, “golddiggers”.

Shall I go on? Or are you now remembering that there are plenty of derogatory terms for women, earned and acquired by mere association, no doubt in your vocabulary.


49 posted on 02/02/2014 12:19:03 PM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson