The Dana Loesch response came in context of a rebuttal by the Blaze that fact checks the abc statistics:
Basically, abc used teen gun misuse to push up the numbers, then packaged those numbers to make it seem as if they described accidental gun injury among the younger children pictured in the report, leading to intentional (IMHO) confusion. This is not sloppy journalism. This is sophisticated propaganda designed to marginalize gun owners, to promote distrust and the kind of “turn in your neighbor” mentality so typical in other Marxist regimes.
Not journalism at all. Maybe reporterism. Like somebody said, you’re entitled to your opinion, you are NOT entitled to the facts. Good job by Dana btw.