Replies

To: afraidfortherepublic

The continued use of the phrase “partner” for a hetero relationship seems strange ... looks like they are trying to defuse a code-word.

38 posted on 02/02/2014 5:06:59 PM PST by NonValueAdded (It's not the penalty, it's the lack of coverage on 1 Jan. Think about it.)

To: NonValueAdded

In the Philip Seymour Hoffman article linked in post 10, that is.

40 posted on 02/02/2014 5:08:06 PM PST by NonValueAdded (It's not the penalty, it's the lack of coverage on 1 Jan. Think about it.)

To: NonValueAdded

The continued use of the phrase “partner” for a hetero relationship seems strange ... looks like they are trying to defuse a code-word.

***
Well, the pair did not even bother to get married, so they could not call her his wife. I guess “shack-up” would have been better.

I skimmed the article, and I still have no idea of who this loser was.

52 posted on 02/02/2014 5:24:43 PM PST by Bigg Red (O LORD, our Lord, how majestic is your name in all the earth! Ps 8)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794