Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: papertyger
Nah, its a useless endeavor. See Dembski's dictum on winning a debate with current evolutionists.

Perhaps you have a link to that "dictum" you can share?

You may have noticed that some evo-trolls still manage to "clutter the place" from time to time under new screen names.

You may think it a useless endeavor, but I don't recall Christ ever telling Christians to stand down in the defense of Truth, do you? In fact I remember reading something in Ephesians 6 that says quite the opposite.

FReegards!

 photo million-vet-march.jpg

122 posted on 02/03/2014 2:34:35 PM PST by Agamemnon (Darwinism is the glue that holds liberalism together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: Agamemnon
Perhaps you have a link to that "dictum" you can share?

Unfortunately due to his voluminous writing about not only evolution, but the arguments used by evolutionists, finding a "favorite riff" written by Dembski is a challenge, even with the help of google. (Like finding a particular "Jones" in a major metropolitan phone book)

If I recall correctly, Dembski laments the fact that nearly all argumentation with modern evolutionists is largely futile, because when challenged by an evolutionarily problematic mechanism in the natural world the evolutionist considers himself the "winner" if he can even conceive of a possible evolutionary pathway to explain the mechanism under discussion...quite apart from any actual evidence for, or consideration of, the plausibility of his explanation.

You may think it a useless endeavor, but I don't recall Christ ever telling Christians to stand down in the defense of Truth, do you? In fact I remember reading something in Ephesians 6 that says quite the opposite.

I don't recall Christ ever telling Christians to conflate promulgation of the Gospel with correcting every error in the thinking of man, particularly when said error is functionally irrefutable.

A perpetual argument with "invincible ignorance" is no different than perpetually tending a tree that gives no fruit.

144 posted on 02/03/2014 6:37:26 PM PST by papertyger ("refusing to draw an inescapable conclusion does not qualify as a 'difference of opinion.'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson