Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tenacious 1
Fair enough. .but my point is this..science has a paradox on creation vs evolution. .it can not test the mechanism to prove evolution. Because anything science does, any test they do and action they take is of course an intelligent act itself....so how can it recreate what they content evolution does with out intelligent intervention?...its a paradox ..any test of evolution vs creation can only prove creation can happen and can not prove evolution as an exclusively mechanism
64 posted on 02/04/2014 2:34:02 PM PST by tophat9000 (Are we headed to a Cracker Slacker War?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: tophat9000

Except that isn’t a paradox, especially under the definition of paradox. You can use tools to recreate (please understand what that word means, it does not mean initially create,) what may or may not have happened. That does not mean that what you’re recereating requires an intelligent touch, it just means you’re doing so because the alternative is waiting for whatever you’re producing to happen naturally.

I can wait for two fish to travel across the atlantic to mate, or I can just gather them myself. One happens naturally, the other has my intervention.

Regardless, I hope the actual debate stays on topic. Abiogenisis is not necessarily evolution, so if the debate is about evolution, hopefully it stays that way.


65 posted on 02/04/2014 3:40:33 PM PST by dallas111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson