Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasGator
I doubt the quadrapligic thinks it is frivolous

I suspect even he knows that it is frivolous. To take money from the manufacturer of a portable toilet just because your own cousins are morons who used their product to injure you is reprehensible. Had the seat fallen out from under him, paralyzing him, I would side with him, since that would likely be the manufacturer's fault. In this case, I fault the lawyers and their greedy client.

10 posted on 02/05/2014 1:23:20 PM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Pollster1

In the defense of the victim, he is paralyzed for life, and he will need expensive care for however long that is.

It’s not really his fault that the courts will eventually stick the manufacturer with the bill when his idiot relations are found not to have two nickles to rub together.

It’s been how these cases have been decided for a long, long time. At least in this state.

They get stuck or the taxpayer gets stuck. Life is unfair.


17 posted on 02/05/2014 2:22:24 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson