E pluribus unum.
Guess this idiot would disagree.
Posted on 02/06/2014 4:03:41 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
If I asked you to describe a proponent of something called “Americanism,” what would you say? My guess is that your mind might jump to a jingoistic Southerner with a rifle, a pick-up truck, and a high school education, who speaks fluent ‘merican. Readers familiar with the work of David Gelernter might talk about a religious creed that views America as a new promised land and Americans as a new chosen people, committed to ideals such as liberty, equality, and democracy.
But at the Super Bowl earlier this week, Coca-Cola asked us to consider a different vision of Americanism, one that is as committed to Gelernter’s fourth great religion as any patriotic redneck or Constitution-wielding Tea-partier.
The ad, which was brilliantly put together, asks the viewer a simple question—Fill in the blank: “as American as _________.”
Apple pie? Little League baseball? Turkey dinner at Thanksgiving? A lone cowboy out on the range?
If you give the last answer, then the ad invites you on a little journey, an audio-visual quest in search of American identity. With no more westward land to conquer colonize settle, where is manifest destiny calling us? What is the next frontier?
And the ad leaves no doubt as to the answer. Manifest destiny is calling us to extend our commitment to liberty, equality, and democracy, to add a fourth ideal to our Americanist creed: diversity.
For those unfamiliar with the ad, I’d invite you to take a look. (For the over-achievers out there, be sure to check out the behind-the-scenes video.) In brief, the ad features a multi-lingual rendition of “America the Beautiful” alongside brief scenes of the various flavors in our multi-cultural melting pot. The languages—English, Spanish, Tagalog (common among Filipinos), Hindi, French, Mandarin, Arabic, and Keres (spoken by the Pueblo tribe of New Mexico). The scenes include a white rancher on a horse, a Filipino family surfing, a Latino family at their Mexican restaurant, Jewish men in yarmulkes looking out a window, Muslim women in hijab, and two gay dads at a roller rink.
Now I’m an evangelical Christian. What’s more, I’m an evangelical Christian who attends a church that annually celebrates ethnic harmony on MLK Day, sings songs in English, Spanish, and Swahili, and has a choir with the name “Every Tribe and Tongue.” So, as soon as the ad jumped into Spanish, I knew exactly what was happening, and resonated deeply with it. I’m a part of a faith that welcomes all nations; therefore, I want to be a part of a nation that welcomes all peoples.
And this is where the ad gets shrewd, and I get skeptical. Because the ad wants to move beyond multi-lingual to multi-religious and multi-sexuality. Let’s break these down one at a time.
Multi-lingual
In itself this seems rather straightforward and obvious. After all, it’s a simple fact that Americans speak more than one language. At the same time, there’s still the reality that one of the key features that has historically defined a people as a people is a common language. This is true even of multi-lingual societies, which often have a common language of trade and government. The ad even acknowledges this to a point, since English is the dominant language throughout the song, appearing at the beginning, middle, and end of the ad.
The reason for a linguistic understanding of people is at one level hopelessly pragmatic—communication requires a shared medium, a lingua franca. The light rail and most of the of the government facilities in my city give instructions in English, Spanish, Somali, and Hmong. But there are limits to this sort of multiplication. And I doubt anyone is going to charge the progressive government of Minneapolis with ethnic bigotry because they don’t offer signage in Mandarin, French, or Arabic. Nevertheless, the ad’s point remains—we are a nation of many peoples and languages, and this sort of diversity is a cause for celebration. (Which is one reason why the nativist reaction to the ad was so appalling.)
Multi-religious
Again the claim itself is largely unobjectionable. After all, religious liberty is enshrined in the Constitution (present legal disputes about mandates and conscience notwithstanding), and America has always been filled with peoples of many faiths. But again the ad is trying to press this point home as well. First, there’s the choice of religions to emphasize. Judaism and Islam are singled out, and with clear intent. By moving from Jewish men wearing yarmulkes to Muslim women in hijab, the ad makes the not-so-subtle point that America is a peacemaker. To co-opt the language of the apostle Paul in the letter to the Ephesians, America breaks down walls of hostility. It ends enmity and strife. The conflict between Jews and Muslims in the Middle East may be intractable, but in America harmony reigns beneath spacious skies. This is a lofty claim, and underscores the ambition (or pretension) of the ad’s Americanism.
What’s more, the claim to transcend religious differences is itself a deeply religious claim, and easily recognized if the situation is reversed. For example, at my church we have an annual Global Focus. During that week, we hang large banners adorned with pictures of people from various ethnicities and countries. We hang flags in our sanctuary that represent the nations of the world, and we do so in the shadow of a large cross and beneath the church’s mission statement which reads, “We exist to spread a passion for the supremacy of God in all things for the joy of all peoples through Jesus Christ.” The implication is unmistakable. In Christ, all ethnic and national barriers are broken down. In Christ, all peoples become one people. For evangelicals like us, ethnicity, nationality, and culture are subordinated to our fundamental identity in the crucified and risen Lord.
The Coke ad essentially inverts this arrangement, making the claim that religious identities are subordinated to America the Beautiful. Diverse religions have their place in Americanism, much as the various temples and cults of ancient Rome were welcomed and celebrated. But there is a supreme god in this pantheon, and all peoples, no matter their creed or denomination, must doff their hat to him/her.
Multi-sexuality
This was clearly the ad’s most striking move, and I’m willing to bet one of the primary motivations for creating it. A gay couple with a young daughter, enjoying a happy day at the roller rink. Having equalized ethnicities, languages, and religions, we must now equalize expressions of sexuality. And, of course, this is the flashpoint of the present iteration of the culture war, and the reason that all of Americanism’s recent holy days have showcased the ascendant sexual orthodoxy of the Americanist creed—from the Macy’s parade to the Rose Bowl parade to the Grammys and now the Super Bowl. This is the ad’s artistic genius—it subtly and powerfully communicates that welcoming diverse languages, diverse religions, and diverse sexualities are equivalent embraces. This, we are told, is one seamless web of celebration.
And, of course, the reverse is true as well. The clear implication of the ad is that to reject the celebration of homosexual practice is no different than rejecting someone because they speak Spanish or have a different color of skin. From Seneca Falls to Selma to Stonewall. To insist on the truthfulness of one’s religion over against those of another is just racism in another guise. And this is where the overarching message of the ad begins to grow shaky.
Americanism would have us believe that diversity is what makes us great. Or, more properly, this kind of diversity makes us great, the kind that celebrates the equal value and worth of different ethnicities, languages, religions, and sexual practices. But, as Hamlet would say, there’s the rub. For the creed that unites all of these diversities is itself a unified, totalizing, and exclusive claim. It’s the creed of Americanism. These diversities can only be celebrated when they are subordinated to a more fundamental claim, one that elevates America into a comprehensive religious ideal.
Or to use the traditional Christian language, Americanism turns America into an idol, a rival claimant for the allegiance and affections of men and women. And as I noted earlier, the God and Father of the Lord Jesus will suffer no rivals. As a Christian, I cannot elevate a creature to the status of Creator. I dare not bow the knee or lift my soul to another.
So then, let me tip my hat to Coke. They brilliantly showcased the fundamental questions facing us as a people. For evangelicals like me (as well as believers in other traditional faiths), the question is: if being a good American requires us to embrace and celebrate the full diversity on display in Coke’s advertisement, is it possible for us to remain good Americans? Or must we humbly dissent from the Americanist creed and in so doing be branded as bad Americans?
For adherents of the ad’s Americanism the question is reversed: How diverse is the diversity that makes us great? Is it wide enough to make room for historic evangelicals, conservative Roman Catholics, traditionalist Muslims, and orthodox Jews? Or does Diversity itself have a limit?
I quote what a visiting pastor said often in Free Republic because it so often relates to the topic at hand. But it has never related as well as it does in this thread, so I post it again:
Where would the early church have been if they had put their faith in Rome?
Beginning in the 300’s they did put their faith in Rome. That’s much of what Martin Luther objected to.
Diversity means all races, sexes, religions, ethnicities and income groups united in leftism and the goal of dismantling America. The last part is key. Anyone of any category who does not share that goal is not considered “diverse”.
Our COMMONALITY draws us together as a Nation
DIVERSITY separates us as a Nation by identifying individual differences , and preferences.
The DIFFERENCES are a personal choice , for purposes of self-identification , heritage , and are voluntary ,
and are not IMPOSED by edict or fiat .
We are a Nation of immigrants, organized by common purpose which we call "Americans" to support
common Borders , Language , and Culture .
But as a Nation , we have the understanding and depth of character to accept outsiders
as long as they are willing to accept the culture and language of their new found home .
Those that refuse to accept the language and culture of the country in which they live are destined to remain identified as "Outsiders",
and by their refusal to accept common language and culture, will never be accepted into mainstream America , by their own choice.
By her very nature, America represents a wide “diversity” of peoples from all walks of life and from all over the world.
That isn’t what irks me about this ad.
What irks me is that they sang “America the Beautiful” in languages other than English!
When people want to become US citizens they must among other things “Be able to read, write, and speak basic English.” (from the Basic Requirements for US Naturalization)
In addition, they must take the following oath IN ENGLISH:
“I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God.”
Now if this ad showed the diversity of all Americans (both native born and naturalized) all singing “America the Beautiful” IN ENGLISH then I doubt anybody would have had any objections to it and it could have very well been one of the best ads of the Super Bowl.
But as it is, it flopped big time.
Brilliant article. Choose you this day whom you will serve...said Joshua.
Civil war is just a matter of time.
Extremely true except for the "funny" part.
We will only become a cohesive country when we start to celebrate our COMMONALITY again. Diversity of origin but commonality of purpose. The Left is tearing this country apart. I hope there will be a road to recovery someday. That road is not close, though.
True progress will begin again when we see the error we have made and do an about face. Unfortunately the way that sort of thing happens on this sort of scale is how it happened to Germany in 1945. It’s involuntary.
When you concealed-carry guns are allowed in one state and private ownership of firearms is effectively outlawed in another, you may as well be dealing with people and governing officials from two different planets.
It's in Coca-Cola's best interest to spout this "diversity" nonsense far and wide. They're in the business of selling soft drinks, not unifying nations ... and they don't really give a sh!t who buys their products.
Coca-Cola’s CEO is a muslim from Turkey. That answers all my questions.
My Great Grand father was born in Sicily, came here with not much more than the shirt on his back. When he passed away he owned half a city block in Buffalo NY. When his daughter (my grandmother) complained about needing to learn English he told her that you live in America you will learn to speak English.
The entire basis of this jackasses argument is cartoonish bigotry. NOT the timeless ideals and Principles proffered by the Founding Fathers. No. Stupid Leftist Bigotry. That's it...
To: originalbuckeye
This is 2014 and the language has been corrupted to imply that lies are the real truth. The REAL truth is that “diversity” as it is used today is a codeword for THE ultimate segregation. Segregation, one from another, complete and utter.
EXCELLENT, NEEDED TO BE REPEATED.
You’re right. And they’ve been working on it through political correctness for 30 years now and some people are even afraid to speak their minds.
Appeals to diversity utterly fail for one reason. While people may indeed take pride in the origins of their ancestors, to carry on too much of the traditions of “the old country” causes personal and familial stagnation.
For example, in talking with a young man who describes himself as “Irish-American”, I found an interesting case of Americanism. Did he immigrate from Ireland? No. Is he an Irish citizen? No. Has he ever been to Ireland? No, but he would like to visit. Does he speak Gaelic? No. Is he a Catholic? Yes, but not practicing.
Truthfully, he has integrated. He is not “Irish-American”, he is American, of Irish descent. If he ever does visit Ireland, it will be as an American, and for the most part, he will be seen by Irish people as an American.
This is the typical path.
But diversity implies that he should have been ghettoized with other Irish people, that he should speak Gaelic, that he should be totally caught up in Irish, not American culture, and obey his priest’s dictates. In other words, handicapped from being a successful American citizen by being mired in the same life as his forebears.
Personal and familial stagnation.
Diversity also implies some degree of shame for being an American. Why else would anyone feel embarrassed in saying they are an American? Why say you are Irish-American?
American does not have much of a definition beyond citizenship. It does not imply a race or religion, except for non-Americans caught up in an “us vs. them” attitude.
But at the same time, being an American *means* things. Important and powerful things.
I agree. Diversity without unity is useless. We can all bring our various ideas to the table, but if all we care about is seeing our personal idea adopted, problems will never be solved.
It’s very simple.
Divide and conquer.
No more, no less.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.