Posted on 02/06/2014 12:34:56 PM PST by SeekAndFind
No Worries! Obambi will soon write another Executive Order and declare that unemployment has been eliminated; all persons actively seeking employment will be awarded job-seeking stipends, funded by the confiscated 401(k)s.
How do you hide education if all of your jobs have been based upon that?
Easy—don’t post the education part. How would they have to know that your courses toward an MBA led to your previous position?
Looks from that graph as if long-term unemployment has already gone on twice as long as any time previously.
to give (a person or thing) a title, right, or claim to something;
= = = = = = = = = = = = =
To go ‘Clinton’ on you...’they’ aren’t GIVING me anything. They are returning money that ‘they’ with held from me ‘for my own good’.
From 54-90 any FICA I paid was matched by Employer.
PART OF MY SALARY/WAGE.
After 1990 I paid entire amount.
Whether I should or shouldn’t ‘take’ it is another story, BUT when it comes to the withholding part, I(WE) were given NO CHOICE.
The original ‘set up’ was to be as a supplement and yes, it was/is the greatest Ponzi Scheme ever thrown on/at the American taxpayer.
Funny how when ‘we’ deal with the pols, ‘they’ are allowed to say a 20% raise in a program is a CUT because ‘they’ proposed a 22% raise in the program. ‘They’ can take 20 cents out of every gallon on gasoline and scream that the people that drill, process, deliver the product etc are GREEDY because they take 5 cents.
Naturally the Gov doesn’t take into effect the ‘other related taxes’ they collect as to the handling and sale of the product...
Even algore said it was being kept in a ‘lock box’ and I am sure they drew more in interest than they are paying out. (now THAT is sarcasm)...
“To go ‘Clinton’ on you...’they’ aren’t GIVING me anything. They are returning money that ‘they’ with held from me ‘for my own good’.”
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
I agree totally, the point I was trying to make is that in the old days it was far from an insult to tell someone they were entitled to something, it was merely acknowledging their right to it. No one would ever have imagined then that welfare or food stamps would be called an entitlement, they were considered anything BUT an entitlement.
In the days before insanity set in you were entitled to the paycheck you earned by working but certainly NOT entitled to get one without work. Likewise you were entitled to social security when you reached the age for it because you had paid for it, no one would have thought there was something wrong with calling it an entitlement.
I think the word has been twisted by the left to mean the opposite of what it used to mean in common usage.
Didn’t pass it because they could not find the money? THAT is a first.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.