Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Turkey’s new carrier alters eastern Mediterranean energy and security calculus
The Jerusalem Post ^ | 02/04/2014 | MICHA’EL TANCHUM

Posted on 02/09/2014 6:35:33 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

The Juan Carlos

1 posted on 02/09/2014 6:35:33 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Here's another view.
2 posted on 02/09/2014 6:42:32 AM PST by AnAmericanAbroad (It's all bread and circuses for the future prey of the Morlocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
ME spun, out of their senses.

3 posted on 02/09/2014 6:43:37 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Caligula / 0'Reid / 0'Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The new fad in the 21st century. Everyone wants a carrier! Everyone wants to force project and show how big their peen is...


4 posted on 02/09/2014 6:46:50 AM PST by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
small compliment of planes types, no angled deck,
no dual land/take-off ability..a one shot ship?

5 posted on 02/09/2014 6:49:19 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Caligula / 0'Reid / 0'Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

So with the ski slope, are the Turks planning to purchase F-35Bs?


6 posted on 02/09/2014 6:52:01 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

It may be a beautiful well designed ship but it would be a leap to rate it an effective warship even if deployed. Foreign navies especially the Chinese all want carriers. However while they may be able to build them or procure them, what they can not readily have are experienced competent crews. The American Navy has over ninety years of carrier experience including much combat. The value of that experience and the constant passing of knowledge cannot be easily created. You can steal plans, buy or produce materials but you cannot easily create competent personnel. It will be a very long time if ever before these foreign navies have effective carriers that can function far from their shores.


7 posted on 02/09/2014 6:56:18 AM PST by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Easy to dismiss a single LHA/LHD as an insignificant bit of power compared to US standards. But in the Eastern Med it could indeed change the regional power game. I trust Turkey knows there’s a long learning period before they can employ it effectively. And as a point-centric power platform, it’s a high-value target.

TC


8 posted on 02/09/2014 6:57:51 AM PST by Pentagon Leatherneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanAbroad

Sub bait.


9 posted on 02/09/2014 7:00:37 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Carriers are indeed sub bait. Many years ago, there was an argument between two Soviet admirals; one favored greater development of submarines, the other favored aircraft carriers and large capital ships.

The latter admiral won the argument at that time; the losing admiral was, if I recall correctly, shot. This was during Stalin’s reign.


10 posted on 02/09/2014 7:05:07 AM PST by AnAmericanAbroad (It's all bread and circuses for the future prey of the Morlocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
Sub bait.

That was exactly my thought.

The real story isn't Turkey's quest for power projection, it's the graft involved in building that ridiculous thing.

11 posted on 02/09/2014 7:07:09 AM PST by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanAbroad

Funny.

If Billy Mitchell had been born a Russian, he would have been shot for advocating air power.


12 posted on 02/09/2014 7:10:37 AM PST by DariusBane (Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pentagon Leatherneck

There isn’t any place in the eastern Med that isn’t within striking distance of a country with 1st class land-based strike aircraft. If this thing isn’t targeted by a sub it will spend all it’s limited deck space hauling interceptors to protect itself.

Really effective carriers have to ship a balanced air wing that can perform ASW, strike & air defense. Smaller carriers sacrifice capability in 1 or more areas.


13 posted on 02/09/2014 7:11:12 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Spaniards build beautiful warships. Always have. Put a Spanish ship into the hands of the English Royal Navy and you have something!


14 posted on 02/09/2014 7:12:31 AM PST by DariusBane (Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

15 posted on 02/09/2014 7:13:52 AM PST by SJackson (the Democrats take back control, we donÂ’t make (this) kind of naked power grab, J Biden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane

“Always have. Put a Spanish ship into the hands of the English Royal Navy and you have something!”

During Nelson’s time the Spaniards did that quite a lot.


16 posted on 02/09/2014 7:22:04 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Yup, that was the era I was referencing. The Spaniard is a lover, not a fighter!


17 posted on 02/09/2014 7:33:22 AM PST by DariusBane (Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
ping...
18 posted on 02/09/2014 8:03:47 AM PST by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane
Probably....though a lot of Russian aircraft designers wound up in Gulag for various reasons. Some of them maybe for interesting, if ludicrous, ideas like this: The Kalinin K-7. "The K-7 first flew on 11 August 1933. The very brief first flight showed instability and serious vibration caused by the airframe resonating with the engine frequency. The solution to this was thought to be to shorten and strengthen the tail booms, little being known then about the natural frequencies of structures and their response to vibration. The aircraft completed seven test flights before a crash due to structural failure of one of the tail booms on 21 November 1933." Seeing as how resonance wasn't really understood back in the early 1930s, I'll give 'em a pass on that one.
19 posted on 02/09/2014 8:12:42 AM PST by AnAmericanAbroad (It's all bread and circuses for the future prey of the Morlocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

That’s my take on it to. Where do the Turks intend to project power? This won’t help them against their immediate neighbors, where they have real interests and conflicts, and some prospect of exerting real power. And I don’t see them sending this thing to somewhere like the Persian Gulf.
Alternately its a bargaining piece to use to trade services with some other power. Something for the Saudis to rent, as part of some Sunni coalition effort far from Turkey. And far from Israel.


20 posted on 02/09/2014 8:16:59 AM PST by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson