Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IMR 4350

Hmmm...I agree that Hillary running against a set-up Romney would have seemed more preferred than running following a certain to be miserable Obama record.

But I thought the whole “video did it” story was to get Obama re-elected...along with CYA for zero and the witch.

A pretty big gamble on their part to try to set up Romney but I definitely wouldn’t put it past Hillary - although hard to imagine Obama falling on his sword for her. Neither of them care about how many are hurt with their power mongering. What arrogant sociopaths - what makes them think they have the right to screw up our lives????


35 posted on 02/10/2014 8:46:37 PM PST by Aria ( 2008 & 2012 weren't elections - they were coup d'etats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Aria

If you can find Hillary’s comments after Benghazi, listen closely to HOW she says what she say’s.

She places great meaning when she says “this government” had nothing to do with the video.

She also places great meaning on “we” when she said “we helped them”.

She was creating talking points for the left wing freaks to use in their defense and to blame Romney and the repubs.

Obama had attempted to create a version of the “spontaneous” lie with the airline plot just a few months before but the AP leaked info before he could.

Go back to 2010 and the attempted car bombing in NYC.

Prior to the attempted attack the left and their allies in the MSM went on a campaign claiming the TEA Party were a bunch of ultra violent, right wing extremist, racist, Tim McVeigh wannabes out to overthrow the govt.

After the attack the left jumped for joy and said their talking points about the TEA Party were correct because it was a fertilizer bomb just like Tim McVeigh used.

There is 1 of 4 possibilities for that attack.

1. The left orchestrated the news for the attack to blame it on TEA Party.

2. The terrorist are so in tune with the news the terrorist picked up on the lefts talking points and “spontaneously” planned an attack around them.

3. The TEA Party did it and the left was correct in their talking points.

4. It’s all just a big coincidence the terrorist attack matched the lefts talking points.

If the terrorist simply picked up on the lefts talking points and “spontaneously” planned an attack around it, you would need to go back check all the other attacks since 1993’s 1st WTC bombing to find out if it was possible the terrorist were picking up on the lefts talking points and planning attacks around them.

Is there a pattern to the lefts talking points and the terrorist attacks?

In fact there is.

Since 1993’s 1st WTC attack, prior to each and every terrorist attack, attempted attack, or threat of attack, the left has always ginned up civil unrest, attempted to gin up civil unrest, or had a plan to gin up civil unrest.

It never fails.

In fact every time the left drags up Rodney King in trying to gin up civil unrest, you can guarantee there is a terrorist attack coming.

Perfect example was Obama’s attempt at the “spontaneous” lie with the airline plot in 2012 which was derailed by the AP leak.

The terrorist gave the govt agent a bomb and told him it was his call to make WHEN the attack would take place.

The timing of announcing the threat of the attack was controlled by Obama.

Prior to it Obama sent people to Florida to gin up civil unrest with the Trayvon Martin case, described by the MSM as another Rodney King incident.

Obama controlled both ends, orchestrating the civil unrest and the timing of the attack, there is nothing spontaneous about it. The news was orchestrated for the attack.

In January 2006 the ACLU, with the help of Al Jazeera and Osama bin Laden making a tape threating an attack, attempted to create a version of the “spontaneous” lie by having the bin Laden tape released after the ACLU passed out video cameras in St Louise to get a repeat of a “Rodney King” type incident.

Problem is bin Laden made the tape before the ACLU passed out the video cameras.

The root of the “spontaneous lie” goes all the way back to the 1st WTC bombing.

The dems pushed Bush into sending troops into Somalia, then after the 1st WTC bombing claimed it was because Bush had sent troops into Somalia when in fact the plans for the attack started in 1991 the same time as the R King video.

An al Qaida doc. recovered in Afghanistan, a letter from Bin Laden to Mullah Omar listed as doc#AFGP-2002-600321 in the CTC at West Point Harmony Database(since disappeared from public viewing), bin Laden stated “the media is 90% of the PREPARATION for the battle”.

The news is being orchestrated for the attacks and the attacks are following the Weather Underground playbook.

Find an incident, a spark to ignite the flame, ratchet it up to a raging inferno.

Orchestrate civil unrest/race riots follow with terrorist attacks.

The only hope Hillary and her minions have to keep from being charged with treason, waging war against the US, mass murder is to try and make it appear as if the repubs are picking up on the dems talking points then collaborating with the terrorist to frame Hillary.

Classic cheap attorney trick.


45 posted on 02/11/2014 5:48:56 AM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson