Posted on 02/13/2014 5:36:57 AM PST by xzins
The obvious question, then, is … why continue? Both Kirsten Powers and Ron Fournier have spent the last day offering cris des coeurs over the incompetence of the White House, as the National Journal columnist did yesterday and Powers did last night on Fox News Special Report (via RCP and Truth Revolt):
KIRSTEN POWERS: Well, I think his explanation is probably the true explanation, that they need to do this, but at the same time, it’s now gotten to the point where it seems like there’s an exemption made for pretty much everybody except for individuals. A lot of people who have really been screwed over by the law, you know, who are left without insurance or with extremely expensive insurance. So, I think that Ron Fournier of The National Journal wrote something that ran today about –
BRET BAIER: This was after he expressed himself last night on the panel.
POWERS: The headline is why I’m getting tired of defending Obamacare. And I’m going to say amen, brother, because it’s exactly how I feel. People who have supported the law, who support universal health care, are constantly put in the position of having to defend this president, who has really incompetently put this together, rolled it out, and that’s why he has to do this. It’s why he has to keep doing this, because it’s not working.
The objection from both assumes that this project had a hope of succeeding in the first place. Let’s not forget that ObamaCare passed nearly four years ago, and HHS had 42 months of lead time until its rollout date. Four months after that, the White House keeps shifting deadlines, plainly to avoid the political consequences of its utter failure and ineptitude. How long is long enough to climb off the bandwagon?
Fournier’s argument on that question rests on a supposed lack of alternatives:
I want the ACA to work because the GOP has not offered a serious alternative that can pass Congress.
That, however, is a circular argument — because a Congress controlled by Democrats in one chamber will not pass any kind of replacement for ObamaCare, no matter how “serious” or workable it might be. Harry Reid wouldn’t even bring it onto the agenda, let alone schedule a floor vote, and Democrats would close ranks with the White House even if he did. Fournier’s argument boils down to the acceptance that Democrats won’t change their minds, so we may as well keep cheering on the failure, and hope that the incompetents that produced it over four years can fix it in six months. That’s absurd, but it’s the final fig leaf for less-partisan supporters of ObamaCare.
Fournier’s colleague Sam Baker argues that Obama’s doing most of the damage to his law now, not Republicans:
Republicans have done everything they can think of to strike down Obamacare, but they’ve still only managed to come in second place. For all the House votes to repeal, defund, or weaken Obamacare, some of the most significant setbacks for the law have come from the administration itself.
Monday’s delay in the law’s employer mandate was just the latest in a series of self-inflicted wounds, just like the HealthCare.gov launch and delays in several programs that simply weren’t ready for prime time.
To be clear, the self-inflicted wounds haven’t been fatal. Obamacare is moving forward—and the doomsayers’ prophecies have fallen flat: People are signing up, premiums are lower than expected, and the law’s basic survival is assured. It gets stronger every month as more people pour into new insurance marketplaces in each state.
But the law does have a specific vision of the future of health insurance. And to hit that vision, it relies on a delicate balance of popular carrots—think coverage for those with preexisting conditions—and unpopular sticks, such as the ever-controversial individual mandate. And the administration keeps chipping away at unpopular parts—sometimes directly, and sometimes by handing Republicans a political weapon.
By the way, who’s going to fix the website, which defenders have mostly cited as the main obstacle on the path to Nirvana? The names have changed, but the faces look awfully familiar:
After denigrating the work of CGI and replacing it as the largest contractor on the federal health care website, the Obama administration is negotiating with the company to extend its work on the project for a few months.
And the new prime contractor, Accenture, is trying to recruit and hire CGI employees to work under its supervision.
I’m sure that will work out well…
They simply will not let go of their fantasies! “Getting tired”!? You’ll notice she hasn’t “gotten tired”. Never will.
Yep.
I think she’s gonna bail eventually and join our side.
Right after our third date.
Hmmm.....
Guess it’s time to get back into tall chicks again.
Gotta find my step ladder....now where’d I put that thing?
Powers “ain’t no way tired” of HillaryCare.
She is just embarrassed of how she was pimping for ObamaCare.
No, didn’t believe it and looked it up....... you are right!
Socialists live for crisis and failure as excuses for government tyranny even though government is the cause of most of the crises and failures. If they can accelerate the process by planned failure, so much the better. As Reagan warned 50 years ago, socilized healthcare is not about healthcare at all, but about opening the door for a Socislist/Marxist coup of America.
Pray that Kristen Powers will rightly divine the Word of God to make a difference in America.
Kirstin may be “tired” of defending Obamacare, but because she’s a liberal, she’ll strap on the burden anyway and continue defending it... along with Obama and her beloved party.
Like any liberal I trust nothing she says.
Man-up Kirsten. Hillary did. Tired? Perhaps you could support Hillary (I don’t feel no ways tired) Care. (or Romneycare)
Lipstick on a pig BUMP!
Exactly. These two aren't in opposition to Obamacare itself, but simply believe the rollout was faulty. People can hope all they want that Kirsten will flip to the conservative side, but that would be a high act of apostasy against her party, and she and her family would pay for it.
The dumbest thing to say; it proves unequivocally what a lib really is and does.
Crack....
Crack crack crack crack....
By July they’ll all be running for the tall grass, methinks.
She actually dated Anthony Weiner, but he's a poopy-head now because he made Democrats (and her in particular) look bad.
Anthony Weiner's ex Kirsten Powers: He Lied to Me
Obama's making the Democrats (and her in particular) look bad, so he's a poopy-head, too.
Neither instance hints that she would ever be anything but a Democrat, but aids her attempt to portray herself as an iconoclast, lest we think that she's stupid.
This has always been the argument why socialism does not work. It just was not implemented correctly. They can never admit that the whole philosophy is WRONG.
The secret to the destruction of the left is to hold them personally responsible for their support of the cult. They are by nature, weaklings.
Kirsten Powers, unlike most Democrat women, at least does not come off as perpetually angry. Plus, she’s one of the few I’d put in the nearly “eye candy” category.
She doesn't look it on the tube, does she...looks practically petite.
That's a tall, willowy, graceful woman right there.
I bet one of us could get her turned around...
...politically I mean!
lol
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.