Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court strikes California law limiting concealed weapons
SFgate.com ^ | thursday, February 13, 2014 | Bob Egelko

Posted on 02/13/2014 11:24:30 AM PST by KneelBeforeZod

California must allow law-abiding citizens to carry concealed firearms in public, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday, striking down the core of the state's permit system for handguns.

In a 2-1 decision, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco said San Diego County violates the Constitution's Second Amendment by requiring residents to show "good cause" - and not merely the desire to protect themselves - to obtain a concealed-weapons permit.

State law requires applicants to demonstrate good cause, as well as good moral character, to carry concealed handguns, while leaving the permit process up to each city and county. The ruling, if it stands, would invalidate that system.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2nd; californiaguns; ccw; rkba
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
Well I won't run out just yet to get a new holster. Unless there is a really good sale that can't be missed. I'm guessing this will be appealed for years.
1 posted on 02/13/2014 11:24:30 AM PST by KneelBeforeZod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KneelBeforeZod

FeinSwine and dumbasaBoxer are going to have kittens.


2 posted on 02/13/2014 11:27:12 AM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KneelBeforeZod

It is far past time that the 2A was recognized as being just as necessary and important as the 1st.


3 posted on 02/13/2014 11:27:37 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KneelBeforeZod

SF Court? This is a stunning ruling! And now San Diego has elected a Republican Mayor, Mayor Faulconer. Perhaps SF’s ruling might not be appealed?


4 posted on 02/13/2014 11:29:04 AM PST by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

CA needs to honor my AR CCW permit.


5 posted on 02/13/2014 11:29:31 AM PST by DCBryan1 (No realli, moose bytes can be quite nasti!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Zathras

Yeah, I thought I heard heads exploding this morning.


6 posted on 02/13/2014 11:30:31 AM PST by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KneelBeforeZod
Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Amazing coming from them......

7 posted on 02/13/2014 11:31:14 AM PST by Osage Orange (I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing
SF Court? This is a stunning ruling!

9th Circus, and yes for that reason.

8 posted on 02/13/2014 11:32:46 AM PST by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

I think the problem is the San Diego County Sheriff, Bill Gore. He is a PC political hack. He was the FBI agent in charge at Ruby Ridge.


9 posted on 02/13/2014 11:34:21 AM PST by forgotten man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KneelBeforeZod

Well it’s about time that we are permitted the same basic freedoms here in Kalifornia as the rest of the country.


10 posted on 02/13/2014 11:39:53 AM PST by Cyman (We have to pass it to see what's in it= definition of stool sample)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KneelBeforeZod

Wait ... the Ninth Circus did what?????


11 posted on 02/13/2014 11:39:58 AM PST by dartuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KneelBeforeZod

I bet some of the judges on the 9th circus have nice arsenals,, and exit plans.


12 posted on 02/13/2014 11:40:26 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KneelBeforeZod

The liberal Nine Circus struck down California’s discriminatory “may issue” concealed carry system - in which California local sheriffs and police chiefs could grant CCWs to politically connected celebrities and campaign donors. It was corrupt and unjust.

And it forces California to move to “shall issue.” A blow to the gun banners in the Bluest state in the country!


13 posted on 02/13/2014 11:41:23 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KneelBeforeZod

From the 9th Circus?.............I’m STUNED..................


14 posted on 02/13/2014 11:48:26 AM PST by Red Badger (Proud member of the Zeta Omicron Tau Fraternity since 2004...................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KneelBeforeZod

It was a 2-1 decision, on appeal it will go in front of all of them if I’m not mistaken.

I think one of the two judges who voted this way is probably getting the icy stare of death from a majority of the bench right now...


15 posted on 02/13/2014 11:48:33 AM PST by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KneelBeforeZod
I don't know about you, but this guy should get a little more training. Not much trigger control. I doubt it was over 10 yards.


16 posted on 02/13/2014 11:49:43 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

It will have to go to the US Supreme Court.

It will have to decide if “may issue” CCW is constitutional. If it isn’t we can expect to see it struck down in New York, Maryland and Puerto Rico. We can also expect Hawaii’s “no issue” to be invalidated as well.

The trend is our friend and definitely speaks to elevating Second Amendment rights to the same level of strict scrutiny as governmental actions on the First Amendment.

In other words, the federal, state and local governments will have to show a compelling state interest in restricting people’s right to bear arms and to defend themselves.

The ant-gun side on the losing end of the battle! Take that Michael Bloomberg!


17 posted on 02/13/2014 11:56:09 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

“I don’t know about you, but this guy should get a little more training. Not much trigger control. I doubt it was over 10 yards”

Thats better than one guy I saw at the range. He was bouncing rounds off the ground at 10 yards.


18 posted on 02/13/2014 11:58:30 AM PST by Brooklyn Attitude (Things are only going to get worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: KneelBeforeZod

Text of the ruling...

http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2014/02/12/1056971.pdf

I skimmed through it. This opens up challenges to the permitting process as a “poll tax” as it infringes on an Individual and protected Right that applies via the 14th and the Supremacy clause.

Just like I’ve been saying for years...


19 posted on 02/13/2014 11:58:31 AM PST by Dead Corpse (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie
I shot much better than that my first time shooting a handgun, let alone on my CHL class qualification!

I really hope that this ruling sticks, since this may be what it takes for the rest of the "may issue" states to get it through their heads that the 2nd Amendment applies to ordinary citizens, not just those with political connections. Considering that most of my family lives in states that do not accept CCWs from my state, I would very much like for those states to actually start accepting my CHL at some point. Otherwise I may not go visit my family again.

20 posted on 02/13/2014 11:58:49 AM PST by lcms rev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson