Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cutofyourjib

What is all this “equal treatment” nonsense? Any man is free to marry any woman that will have him, and vice versa. I fail to see the discrimination. To say people should be able to marry whomever they love changes the definition of marriage and is silly.


16 posted on 02/13/2014 8:32:48 PM PST by bk1000 (A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bk1000
Any man is free to marry any woman that will have him, and vice versa.

Bingo! Exactly right. This needs to be shouted high and low. There is NO discrimination.

62 posted on 02/14/2014 6:34:56 AM PST by JustSurrounded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: bk1000
I fail to see the discrimination. To say people should be able to marry whomever they love changes the definition of marriage and is silly.

It was not considered discrimination that one not be permitted to marry a sibling or, in most cases, even a first cousin (of the opposite sex).

So why is a restriction on a Biblically and biologically unsound union considered discrimination?

They remain free to marry, just not under conditions imposed on all. Because those conditions were imposed on all, there is no discrimination, only their desire to act in opposition to the conditions.

As for the whomever they love part, what if that is a pet, a child, a sibling? What kettle of worms do they open with this nonsense? Those ruling this way are sick, twisted, or patently insane.

105 posted on 02/16/2014 6:09:20 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson