Actually, I made a mistake. I was speaking of thimerosal (aka thiomersal), but misspoke and called it by the name of another common (but highly toxic in high doses) laboratory preservative. Everything I said was, in fact, referring to thimerosal.
FYI, if you read the excerpt from the FDA carefully, you will see that it does not say anywhere that thiomersal is a health hazard as used. It only says that "concerns" have been raised. Medical studies continue to support the safety of the use of thiomersal in vaccines.
So you FORGET to mention Thimerosal, and DEFEND the use of sodium azide, INJECTED into children and infants, while demanding references from me from pharmaceutical-backed publications?
As I said, calling thiomersal by the wrong name was a mistake. Yes, even scientists make mistakes--we are, however, willing to correct ourselves when the mistakes are pointed out.
I have given you a number of sources for medical information in previous posts. These sources are not, as you claim, "pharmaceutical-backed publications." These sources are where researchers such as myself publish our experimental findings so that other researchers can see them. These sources are used by physicians to keep current in their fields. If you go to the PubMed database as I suggested, you will see that it contains no ads and it is not trying to sell you anything. The other sites like WebMD, Mayo Clinic, and so forth, do run ads, but they are not trying to sell their own products. Also, I have nothing particularly against the pharmaceutical industry. I'd much rather take an antibiotic tested for safety and efficacy in thousands of people than risk my health (and waste money) by taking "supplements" of unknown or questionable composition that have not been tested and are being sold by people who have no scientific or medical training.
Lastly, there is nothing wrong in demanding reliable references for ridiculous claims. If you are going to claim that vaccines are killing people, you'd better be able to come up with a reliable reference to support the claim. The CDC records all causes of deaths, every year. While many people die of infectious disease, I have never seen a mention of even one person dying from a vaccine--despite hundreds of millions of vaccinations administered every year. You can read about significant causes of illness and mortality at the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. I read this report every week.
So you conduct experiments on your own dime? And you medical publications also operate solo? And there’s no pharmaceutical money in any of it? LOL.
And as a medical researcher, a scientist who is of the highest ethics and so admits mistakes when they are pointed out, somehow forgets that the actual chemical is thimerosol - in a discussion concerning mercury in vaccines? LOL.
But hey it doesn’t matter anyway because even though millions of people made enough of a protest for enough year that the thimerosol was finally forced to be admitted as a danger - it’s actually not, because your publications don’t admit a certain level of danger that you consider a danger (and you’re sure you’re remembering what cehmical they’re talking about as being safe, right?). LOL.
And the CDC doesn’t report death from vaccines, so there are no deaths from vaccines - period. LOL.
But that’s not talking about injuries from vaccines - but that doesn’t matter because the CDC is pure, and is not in any way legally influenced by reporting standards set up by the vaccines courts, nor lobbyists for the pharmaceutical companies. LOL.
And in any event, any medical source other than ones you cite, even those including MDs who don’t agree with you, literally do not even exist as a legitimate informations source precisely because they are not one of the sources you cite - and therefore you don’t have to adresss any of their findings. LOL.
Which of course means that all alternative medicine on the planet, meaning literally everything from every country that is not found in YOUR selected publications that somehow operate free from multi-trillion dollar multinational pharmaceutical influence - does not even EXIST as medical information. Zip.
What can I say other than that you are utterly shameless.
How shameles, Ms. Scientist? How about this bit of unpublished, non-medical information that is worth nothing: The medical establishment says there is only a “trace” of mercury in timerosol vaccinations......well lets define “trace”. A trace according to them is 25 mcg (micrograms) in a 0.5ml (millilitre) dose. Hold that thought.
The EPA classifies any substance having greater than 200ppb (parts per billion) of mercury as toxic waste, that must be disposed of through the appropriate channels (i.e. HAZMAT protocol).
Now go back to “trace”. PPM (parts per million) is mcg per millilitre....so using 25mcg per 0.5ml dose we have 50ppm of mercury per dose.
PPB is mcg per litre.
To compare apples to apples and make our EPA data relevant, we need to convert 50ppm to ppb, so we move the decimal 3 places (just as we would to take ml to L). What does this give us??
50,000ppb!! That’s 250 times the hazardous waste concentration!
And not merely ingested - oh no - inJECTed. And not just into adults - into BABIES. And not just once, but multiple times starting from the moment of birth.
I’m through with you.