Such is your recourse when your specious statements are exposed. The fact is that you utterly failed to show how atheism can consistently determine which things are sin, as lacking any supreme standard which defines moral absolutes and sins then sin is whatever every atheist reasons it to be, if he even would any support moral absolutes.
At least you oppose fornication, and i hope exclude gay marriage, but plenty of your comrades differ based on their atheistic reasoning.
You prove my thesis right, again and again.
You use labels and place your own meaning to them and then ask me why “my comrades” don’t think like I do. Only a certified moron resorts to this strategy of forcing guilt by (accusative) association.
My opinions stand by their own merit. Since you obviously couldn’t dispute the arguments I made to support my views, this is in itself a proof of their absoluteness. Hence you resorted to the cheap (but failed) trick of trying to pigeon-hole me into labels to hide your failure. The reasons I gave are not out of whim. The point is, if you can’t dispute them, there is inherent truth in them. You repeatedly mention that the truth to me is anything I may reason for my own fancy. The problem with this silly excuse for reasoning on your part is that you’re unable to prove me wrong. You keep missing the point that this failure (of yours and any one else who tries, for that matter) is proof of the absoluteness of my claims.