when affronted with idiocy i do tend towards arrogance. I fall into it rather easily.
It’s a good thing to question authority, to remain detached from the leftist media programming, to maintain a healthy amount of skepticism, to act as a member of a jury who refuses to be tampered with.
William Clinton and all of his party, all of his NY media and Beltway pundits tried their best to have us believe one thing against the truth, so it does happen that big lies are made and supported politically.
I know 911 happened, I had a friend inside one of the buildings that came down; I’ve stood at ground zero. It is true that many families of victims of 911 filed lawsuits:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/9-11-families-shot-suing-saudi-arabia-article-1.1553620
What Mr. Halbig is pointing out is ‘unusual’ and bears looking at with an objective eye. It doesn’t mean that we as ‘members of the jury’ have to believe the murder did not occur but only that we should hear the facts. We need not decide anything.
One fact is clear, the left tried their damnedest to disarm Americans in the aftermath of Sandy Hook. To my surprise and comfort Americans held them back and I witnessed people here in liberal Seattle saying they know that gun registration leads to gun confiscation which leads to tyranny just as it has under totalitarian regimes of the past. This was to me quite surprising.
In my first impression Mr. Halbig’s background seems credible and I find it hard to believe he would jump to a conclusion that the murders did not happen. If I were to contact him I would expect him to say the murders did happen but there are several ‘unusual’ things about the case that suggest a closer look is warranted as to facts.
Then I would look at the news source “American Free Press”. Are they leftist liars, provocateurs? Often the evil geniuses of the left try to change the national focus by creating a conspiracy story that makes conservatives look kooky and dangerous. I am not going to investigate the American Free Press because I don’t care at this point.
But you should understand that I have been here on FR a long time and have seen time and time again how ‘kooky’ thoughts and ideas have a way of eventually becoming credible and vindicated; not always but often enough to encourage a healthy skepticism.