[Rockingham]

If Romney had won in 2012, he might well have been a disappointment -- and at times an aggravation -- but he would have been far better than having Obama reelected. So also might Romney in 2016 be our best shot at defeating Clinton or whomever the Democrats nominate. I do not advocate for Romney, I only point out that we ought not to rule him out as a possible candidate.

[ansel12]

I love the way you guys do this, here you are promoting and arguing for Romney while ignoring the facts about him, showing true devotion to him and getting him in the race for his and the GOP’s THIRD loss in a row, and you say “I do not advocate for Romney”, while advocating for Romney and pushing him like crazy.

The romneybots are out out early this time, and they sound the same as they have since 2006.

[ansel12]

OK I just looked into your posting history, you have been a romneybot all along, even supporting him back in 2008.

You only play dumb and spontaneous as a part of your routine, you have been pushing the guy since preferring him and voting for him in 2008.

You know the facts, it’s just that you like his liberalism, here we are on a Palin thread in 2010 where you are denigrating Palin and comparing Romney to Reagan.

To: Rockingham
*”Do you have reliable sources for your claims against Romney?”*
Of course I do, you have six years here and you never learned anything about the guy, yet you like him as a candidate?
94 posted on 2/8/2010 9:55:32 AM by ansel12