As for Romney being a liberal, he enjoyed the support of Human Events, National Review, and virtually all major conservative figures.
Fo example, immediately after the 2012 election, Ann Coulter wrote that "Romney was the perfect candidate, and he was the president this country needed right now. . . . Indeed, Romney is one of the best presidential candidates the Republicans have ever fielded. Blaming the candidate may be fun, but it's delusional and won't help us avoid making the same mistakes in the future."
It is amusing to watch you drop your veil.
This is why you never engage on the specific facts about Romney, for you, it is always the sales pitch, the advancing of his name forward.
Aside from the fact that he can’t win elections, his pro-abortion position and ads that he re-adopted after he won the nomination, will keep him from running in 2016, from his days as a Planned Parenthood fund raiser, to his impassioned pleas for abortion, and family stories in defense of his pro-abortion beliefs, to his switching back to them in 2012, he could never reverse himself yet again for the 2016 cycle.
There won’t be a 2016 Romney, but you guys can hope to elevate him and utilize him to make sure of getting in another weak rino for 2016, which is the intention of the liberal wing, although you personally, seem to just truly want more Romney.
In 2016 not only would he have to confront his lifelong support for abortion, but he would also have to defend his wanting to remove the GOP pro-life position from the party platform in 2012.