Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: steve86

They are clearly dropping any pretense that it is about “gay rights” since nobody would ever considered it a “right” to have their union forcibly defined for them. It is now about getting the state’s citizens to enthusiastically accept being shackled.

That said, it may be time for the red states to just rely on the 10th Amendment when it comes to relationships between the feds and states. They should probably say that if the coastal states want to go full totalitarian and leave American values behind entirely, then let them make their bed and lie in it.


3 posted on 02/17/2014 3:46:39 PM PST by freedom462
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: freedom462

This is the logical conclusion when the State gets into the business of defining what is or is not a marriage.


10 posted on 02/17/2014 3:51:36 PM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson