Posted on 02/18/2014 8:43:17 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
The climate science maverick believes catastrophe is inevitable, carbon offsetting is a joke and ethical living a scam. So what would he do?
In 1965 executives at Shell wanted to know what the world would look like in the year 2000. They consulted a range of experts, who speculated about fusion-powered hovercrafts and "all sorts of fanciful technological stuff". When the oil company asked the scientist James Lovelock, he predicted that the main problem in 2000 would be the environment. "It will be worsening then to such an extent that it will seriously affect their business," he said.
"And of course," Lovelock says, with a smile 43 years later, "that's almost exactly what's happened."
Lovelock has been dispensing predictions from his one-man laboratory in an old mill in Cornwall since the mid-1960s, the consistent accuracy of which have earned him a reputation as one of Britain's most respected - if maverick - independent scientists. Working alone since the age of 40, he invented a device that detected CFCs, which helped detect the growing hole in the ozone layer, and introduced the Gaia hypothesis, a revolutionary theory that the Earth is a self-regulating super-organism. Initially ridiculed by many scientists as new age nonsense, today that theory forms the basis of almost all climate science....
(Excerpt) Read more at theguardian.com ...
Maybe the fan will cool it off.
James Lovelock: ‘Fudging data is a sin against science’
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/mar/29/james-lovelock
Actually, we have a lot less time left than 20 years.
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2006/01/27/algore_we_have_ten_years_left_before_earth_cooks
If Al told me it was snowing I’d put on shorts and flip-flops and head to the pool.
i think thats what they said 20 years ago too
Remember when “Sting” trundled out onto stage his personal toy Amazon chieftain, and then whined about how there would ABSOLUTELY be NO Brazil rainforest AT ALL in 10 years...?
And that was about 20 years ago?
Remember?
It's one thing to predict calamity decades from now based on lies and misinformation but an entirely different thing to look at a past prediction that didn't come true and then lie about clearly observable facts. These are the kind of people that will tell you the sky is bright green with a straight face when you can clearly observe that it is blue.
Global warmists seem to have all the conviction, enthusiasm, and rationality as those who followed Marshall Applewhite to paradise.
Please bring us some global warming....NOW!!
Fudging data is a sin against science
Agreed.
That is just what Al Gore did with “An inconvenient truth”
"This rich honky pays me to sit here
with this huge thing I don't usually wear..."
Interestingly, pretty much everyplace Agore goes, it snows.
15 days..9 snowstorms and whaaaat?
Oh, boy. That would be news to every climate scientist I've ever met, including the ones who still believe in anthropogenic global warming...er, sorry, "climate change". It's a religion, yes, but not that kind of a religion.
It is a fantastically complicated system, yes, and it very definitely shows self-regulation, but "organic" is only an adjective best reserved for mystics and children. "Mother" Gaia isn't going to wipe your nose or change your diaper, but she sure as hell will kill you.
This guy is a nut.
“perhaps if we had taken action in 1967”
Ummm James... we did.
It’s called the EPA and it has become a monster.
" 'Rainforest GONE in 10 years', ya got it..? Screw
that up onstage in front of those cameras, and it's
NO CASH, and my roadies grab you by the throat,
right about HERE..."
actually it doesn’t matter what the climate is because in 20 years the US economy will have collapsed and that will be the least of our problems.
You are correct, and I should have said that specifically. Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.