Free Republic is Your Voice and Your Forum!
We Really Need and Appreciate Your Loyal Support!
PLEASE Make Your Donation Today Monthly, if You POSSIBLY & RELIABLY can!
LOL. A little better than yesterday’s, but he’s still worried about Senator Cruz.
At least today he placed the blame on the very weak Boehner and the unprincipled GOP-e.
I am glad, I guess, that he decided to “clarify”
True that. With his follow up he at least put blame where it belongs. :)
He’s got to work on that ‘unjustified’ claim
Out of nowhere
Not to mention that Cruz is a master of justifiable causes Its in his DNA
Saw a van yesterday brand new, clean, all over the windows was written things of this nature such as republicans beware
And this: ‘Cruz is not going away’
Taken as a pair, the two articles together are less damning of Cruz, Lee and others of his subset than the part one was standing alone.
Was Cruz by taking principled stands the creator of the division or was Republican leadership trying to marginalize conservative wing members after the 2010 bi-elections the start of the division?
Who can say? But with this second part, the old line Republicans are reminded that they are just as much responsible for the division and lack of effectiveness as the conservative faction with Cruz as their most visible activist.
Going back to Sowell’s point in the first article can now be done. Is the opposition divided, as in his example of division prior to the totalitarian Hitler moving his toe-hold of 32% and a place in the power structure into full control of power? Are we dithering about direction and allowing the defeat of our system of government because of division?
The answer is of course yes. Who has to move most to unify?
Who cares.
But movement for unity is the obvious need and it must happen prior to the start of the election cycle and both sides must do it.
Sowell is our Burke, our Kirk, and our Hayek. We must declare as Thatcher did, refering to Hayek, and slam Sowell’s words down on the podium and say as she said, “This is what we believe.”
Maybe Dr Sowell took a lot of heat from yesterday’s column/Part I. He’s come around, somewhat, with Part II.
Maybe he’ll write a Part III and be back on the right track, and back to his self :)