Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

But the State will protect you!
bearingarms.com ^ | 2/19/2014 | Bob Owens

Posted on 02/20/2014 8:58:13 AM PST by rktman

Huffington Post writer Monica Bauer claims that she has “A New Argument for Gun Control,” but sounds like the same old worn-out lies to me.

(Excerpt) Read more at bearingarms.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; guncontrol
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: rktman
Not only is her argument not new, her engaging in typical liberal "projection" is not new either:

...ready access to guns is, in the terminology of Catholic dogma (but logical to anybody who can think) an occasion of sin. If you want to avoid committing a sin, stay away from the immediate temptation

No it is NOT logical. It is an example of projecting her own evil intentions on the rest of us. What is this "temptation" of which she speaks? The fact that SHE would apparently be constantly tempted to commit murder if she had a gun readily available to her does not mean everyone is so tempted.

I have NEVER felt the slightest temptation to shoot someone simply because I was carrying a gun. Even on the two occasions in my life when I found it necessary to brandish a firearm in order to assure my self-protection (neither of which ultimately involved the necessity of firing the weapon) I STILL felt no temptation, nor inclination, to shoot the perpetrator unless it became absolutely necessary.

21 posted on 02/20/2014 1:11:44 PM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th (and 17th))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Are you 100% certain of this?

Many of us have never actually seen or met Jim Robinson; but we are regularly made aware he exists by the small gifts he leaves lying around FR for us.

You have to admit, that is VERY gnome-like behavior.

;-)


22 posted on 02/20/2014 1:14:44 PM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th (and 17th))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rktman
"Should the government have the right to regulate access to something that makes it incredibly easy to turn a dispute into a death?

No, it should not. And, in fact, it does not, and CAN not have such a right -- because government does not HAVE "rights", government has POWERS.

But, it shouldn't have the POWER to do it either - and, by a strict reading of our Constitution, it does NOT have that power.

23 posted on 02/20/2014 1:18:36 PM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th (and 17th))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS
He does indeed exist.

And he does not have a (g)nome de plume.

You can find him Here until the task at hand is completed.

24 posted on 02/20/2014 1:47:45 PM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson