Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former Member of the Supreme Court Wants to Add These Five Words to the Second Amendment
The Blaze ^ | 22 Feb 2014 | Jason Howerton

Posted on 02/22/2014 10:25:10 AM PST by mandaladon

Pro-gun advocates will likely be relieved that John Paul Stevens, 93, is now retired and no longer serving as a member of the Supreme Court. In his upcoming book, “Six Amendments: How and Why We Should Change the Constitution,” he argues for a slight change to the Second Amendment that would fundamentally alter its meaning.

As written by the Founding Fathers in the U.S. Constitution, the Second Amendment reads:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. Stevens argues that the authors of the Second Amendment were mostly concerned about being oppressed by a national standing army, not so much about the right to self-defense.

So in order to reflect the changing times, he says, the Second Amendment should be altered to add five key words:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms when serving in the militia shall not be infringed.

“Emotional claims that the right to possess deadly weapons is so important that it is protected by the federal Constitution distort intelligent debate about the wisdom of particular aspects of proposed legislation designed to minimize the slaughter caused by the prevalence of guns in private hands,” Stevens writes in his defense of the change.

Stevens retired in 2010 after serving on the nation’s highest court for 35 years.

The odds of his crusade to transform the Second Amendment has little chance of even receiving serious consideration as Americans have rejected gun control efforts at the state and federal levels.

(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; guns; scotus; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 last
To: GeronL

Amending the Constitution is an extremely difficult & cumbersome process just as the Founders designed it. An Amendment can be repealed or modified only by passing & ratifying a new Amendment. Look up Prohibition.

Justice Stevens is joining William O. Douglas in terms of irrelevant carping senility. If he feels that strongly about limiting gun rights, then he should start his campaign forthwith.


81 posted on 02/22/2014 1:32:24 PM PST by elcid1970 ("In the modern world, Muslims are living fossils.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Pete from Shawnee Mission; 3Fingas

Exactly....you’d think a former Supreme Court Justice would know better....


82 posted on 02/22/2014 1:33:02 PM PST by goodnesswins (R.I.P. Doherty, Smith, Stevens, Woods.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

goodnesswins asked: “What’s the meaning of ‘militia?’”

The legal definition is still a part of current federal law, here’s the relevant section of the U.S.C.:

10 U.S. Code § 311 -
Militia: composition and classes
(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b) The classes of the militia are—
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.

You see, the constitution grants Congress the authority to mobilize the “militia” but does not define that key term. However, the same legislators that drafted and approved the Bill of Rights also decided to pass the Militia Acts, which among other things delegated Congressional authority to mobilize the militia to the President. In so doing, they wrote a legal definition of what the militia was. This gives modern readers clear insight into what the writers were really thinking of when they wrote “militia” in the second amendment.

Congress defined the militia as consisting of all able-bodied males of military age in the nation. Fascinatingly enough, the Second Militia Act required that all able-bodied males of military age in the nation acquire and keep ready the standard-issue military weapon of the age and keep it along with sufficient ammunition to wage a pitched battle. This is somewhat akin to the militia system in Switzerland that helped ensure the Swiss were able to remain neutral and free through both world wars (you see, the entire voting public, armed to the teeth and hiding in the mountains, aren’t an easy target even for world superpowers right next door).

Later acts of congress such as the Dick Act (established the National Guard in 1903, also called The Militia Act), and the Selective Service Act of 1917, all build upon this legal framework - and as a matter of fact build upon 10 U.S.C. §311 by changing the wording of that established part of federal law (hence the inclusion of women who are members of the national guard into the modern definition of militia). Simply put, all able-bodied men in the nation make up the “militia”, though we’ve expanded the definition over the years to include modern organizations into the traditional umbrella.

If you’ve ever been drafted, or had to register with selective service, understand that the legal and constitutional reasoning behind those actions stems from the simple fact that by legal definition you are a member of the militia and may be called out to defend your nation in time of need.

As the founders envisioned the militia, they imagined the entire body politic armed with the military arms in widespread use by the military powers of the world. Liberty simply cannot exist without the means to defend it, and the founders envisioned a society in which each citizen had both legal rights and the physical means to ensure those rights were never abrogated by either foreign armies or domestic tyrants.


83 posted on 02/22/2014 1:45:16 PM PST by jameslalor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

“Where Stevens’ idea fails is where those “serving” in the militia will get their arms, if they are not allowed to keep them when not formally organized. Is he suggesting that each locality keep a public armory where the citizens go to get their arms when called up to serve?”

Yes, they would be in an armory because what Stevens obviously believes the “militia” to be today is the various National Guard Units - not the general citizenry. Of course, this is not, IMO, what the COTUS writers intended. Fortunately, there is no movement to amend the 2nd amendment. Also, since the Heller decision, it is finally being seen as an individual right instead of merely a collective one.


84 posted on 02/22/2014 1:57:27 PM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon
Until they are dead.

Nope, they continue to vote for dems and leftist ideals from beyond the grave.

Mark

85 posted on 02/22/2014 2:13:05 PM PST by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
Better it should be called “Joe-Bob’s Fuzzy Bunny Militia”.

I've always liked "Glub Glue Glee Club.(hat tip to Crusader Rabbit)

86 posted on 02/22/2014 2:14:57 PM PST by dearolddad (/i>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

The retired Marxist Stevens is still working towards a Marxist utopia.


87 posted on 02/22/2014 2:33:59 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (Play the 'Knockout Game' with someone owning a 9mm and you get what you deserve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

dementia is so sad


88 posted on 02/22/2014 2:52:20 PM PST by School of Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon

They then continue to vote.


89 posted on 02/22/2014 3:52:31 PM PST by Eagles6 (Valley Forge Redux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

>> “Emotional claims that the right to possess deadly weapons is so important that it is protected by the federal Constitution distort intelligent debate about the wisdom of particular aspects of proposed legislation designed to minimize the slaughter caused by the prevalence of guns in private hands,” <<

.
What about the slaughter of innocent civilians caused by the prevalence of guns in the hands of raging government employees?
.


90 posted on 02/22/2014 5:30:17 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
The English Bill of Rights dates from 1689, 100 years earlier. At times the US Bill of Rights resembles the English version.

One of the provisions in the English version reads:

"That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defense suitable to their condition, and as allowed by law."

I'm not saying that version is better--I don't think Catholics, Jews, or other non-Protestants should be excluded--and the "as allowed by law" leaves too much leeway to the authorities, but there is nothing about militia in the English version.

91 posted on 02/22/2014 5:51:40 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Amazingly everyone thought the first 10 amendments were about individual rights all this time

Shows how naive some of us are!! I mean after all this moron is a "brilliant SCOTUS Justice, appointed by the Repubs.
92 posted on 02/22/2014 6:07:15 PM PST by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

93? Die already.


93 posted on 02/22/2014 7:17:17 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: x

Reread the militia act of 1903 aka the Dick act it says the militia is in two parts ,the active militia ie the National Guard & the inactive militia consisting of basically all able bodied citizens between 17 & 45 years of age. I think the Justice wasn’t thinking clearly on this one cause it would give a guarantee to carry arms unless the law is again changed.


94 posted on 02/22/2014 7:17:58 PM PST by Nebr FAL owner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson