Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoConPubbie

>> First the Libertarians would have to be small ‘l’ Libertarians

Yes.

There are two prominent social issues that young folks need to understand: 1) killing nascent human life is not libertarian, 2) forcing the citizens to support and service homosexual behavior through law is not libertarian.


7 posted on 02/22/2014 4:36:48 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Gene Eric
"There are two prominent social issues that young folks need to understand: 1) killing nascent human life is not libertarian, 2) forcing the citizens to support and service homosexual behavior through law is not libertarian. "

Most of the libertarians I run into would be totally aboard with the first clause...but would prefer no state sponsored/codified marriage. Where that state sponsorship exists, they would see no harm to allowing homos to marry each other.

Abortion is generally not supported by libertarians.

24 posted on 02/22/2014 7:55:27 PM PST by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Gene Eric
1) killing nascent human life is not libertarian.
2) forcing the citizens to support and service homosexual behavior through law is not libertarian.

No, but it is Libertarian.

29 posted on 02/22/2014 8:50:07 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson