Skip to comments.CNN Declares No Two Sides to Climate Change Debate
Posted on 02/23/2014 7:44:57 AM PST by PJ-Comix
Have you ever seen a four year old kid who is completely closed to any type of reasoning? Typically his hands will cover his ears and he will scream loudly to block out any arguments others might give to the contrary. Well, CNN has become that unreasoning four year old kid.
And what type of reasoning is CNN attempting to block out? Anything that might contradict their blind faith in global warming or climate change as they now call it. Yes, CNN has declared that there are no two sides to the climate change debate. Here is the amazing shutdown debate statement written by Hardy Spire that CNN released in a promo for today's Reliable Sources:
And there are some stories which do not have two sides. The climate change debate is one of them. Nevertheless, many news organizations continue to equate the skeptics with the scientists. This week NBCs Meet the Press faced criticism for its debate between Bill Nye the Science Guy and Rep. Marsha Blackburn. Well talk to Michio Kaku from the City University of New York and CBS News as well as Jack Mirkinson, Senior Media Editor at the Huffington Post.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Only God controls the weather. The more people take God out of the equation the worse the weather gets. Perhaps the Lord is throwing hints.
It's true, the climate changes.
The idea that we did it, and can change it back by wasting trillions on "green energy", is what I'd like to debate.
Their Leader told them the discussion is over ,so they must tow the line over at CNN(Children s News Network)
Hardy Spire’s Experience
Senior Producer, Reliable Sources
Manage staff of thirty people and the day-to-day operations and $8.5 MM budget of the energyNOW! and Cleanskies newsroom. Responsible for oversight and development of editorial, technical, and online operations as well as public outreach.
August 2005 September 2008 (3 years 2 months) Washington, DC
White House Producer
Public Company; 10,001+ employees; Broadcast Media industry
Like there’s measurable science IQ in all of CNN.
I think today's neo commies accuse the other side of the odious things they themselves are doing because they suffer from psychological projection. The idiocies they say and do are just so disgusting that they themselves cannot handle it.
EnergyNOW provides a home for innovative public projects sponsored by the American Clean Skies Foundation, a Washington D.C. based non-profit working for clean energy.
These projects include:
energyNOW! TV, a half-hour video news magazine that aired weekly on Bloomberg cable from 2010 to 2012.
Renewable Power Direct (RPD), a start-up venture offering a new way for major electricity users to buy green power directly from proven wind and solar projects.
American Clean Skies Foundation
ACSF is an independent nonprofit working for cleaner energy in the U.S. transportation and power sectors.
Our Board of Directors - Warren G. Lavey Senior Fellow, Environmental Law and Policy Center (Chicago); Partner, Skadden Arps (retired)
If it is settled, why are they spending so much money continuing to study it?
What’s really FUnnie is watching them try to peddle this BS under the banner of “science”. They must have been playing hooky the day the “scientific method” was taught in school.
I can refute MAN made global warming in one paragraph
Once upon a time, long before the industrial revolution, north America was covered in ice. It is no longer covered in ice. Why? Non MAN made global warming.
As an added bonus, humans thrived along with this global warming so you could say global warming is something we would want to occur.
Sort of like when they cut off the water to the California central valley and then blame “the drought”.
We are being conned.
If the science on Global Warming is “settled” then why do scientists keep asking for government funding to study it?
Do not insult four year olds. They are MORE MATURE than CNN personals.
What’s the difference between a Climatologist and Astrologist??? Nothing!!! Well actually...., Astrological predictions are probably more accurate. I did win five dollars on the lottery on Wednesday.
“And there are some stories which do not have two sides. The climate change debate is one of them”
Hardy boy, kinda hard to have a “debate” with only one side. I think you meant to use the word “dogma” instead of “debate”. Otherwise, your “debate” would be pretty much just mental masturbation, which BTW, is what so-called global warming (oops, I mean “climate change”) is really all about.
If only they paid attention to the national power grid....
CNN>>Turner Broadcasting>>Time Warner
“Where ideology trumps profit”
I wonder why more people aren’t making the connection to billionaire Lefty Envirowhackist Tom Speyer... when 100 million bucks yells “jump!” Lefty Whores yell back: “how high?” witness SecState lunatic Kerry blurting his warmist mouth stool from the Middle East last week... huh? Brief pause. Oh, right... 100 million bucks. It couldn’t be more obvious once you think about it.
Bill Nye the Science Guy? What's wrong?.....wasn't Big Bird available?
From the Encyclopedia Goreannica: Climatology consists of several systems of divination based on the premise that there is a relationship between weather phenomena and events in the human world. Many cultures have attached importance to meteorological events, and... developed elaborate systems for predicting terrestrial events from meteorological observations.
The idea that we should even try to prevent climate change needs to be considered. Nature has been changing the climate for billions of years. Even if we could, would it be a good idea to try to stagnate the climate?
“...CNN(Children s News Network).”
A heretic to some...
“No Two Sides to Climate Change Debate”
Isn’t that an oxymoron? It is not possible to have a debate unless you have an opposing point of view...
Of course there’s climate change — with every season change — every snowfall, every “Indian Summer”.
So we can not let them get away with calling their global warming BS money-making scheme by any other descriptive name.
Ridicule them/Question them on why the name change and refuse to go along with their games.
We used to learn that in grade school.
My guess is it’s no longer being taught, considering an informed public is a danger to the activists.
If you go to the article at cnn, the comments are GREAT! They all rip can to shreds!
Yeah. I’m thinking photosynthesis is something modern kids have never heard of.
A guy at work was telling me the other day what a good thing it is that Popular Science decided to close its Comments sections forever, because they were getting nutcase comments from flat-earth nutcases. I just shook my head at him.
I would not know.I have not watched CNN in over 15 years.
Warming fanatics have all the characteristics of cultists. It really doesn’t matter how well researchers and cult critics present evidence that refutes cults and their apologetics. If the same research is used twice, the cultists will come back and say it is the same old argument that was wrong to begin with. Without knowing what the research is, or how the critics defend their position, the fanatics dismiss it as old news that didn’t work.
They need to ask Mark Steyn about that. He is on Dr. Mann’s a$$ like white on rice. To the tune of $10 million!
Or, Climate Nonsense Network
Outstanding! Have them whip up a final report on the subject and shut the doors and go home. Just think of the money/energy/resources the urt mudder can save.