Well you have to admit, copy and paste from the regime’s missives saves them a lot of work!
Reporting is so much easier when you don’t have to do the writing yourself.
just about the only reason to read the NYT is for the (admittedly sicko) entertainment value of seeing what Big Lies and stories from Alternate Universes they’ve managed to cook up recently...
It was a beautiful payoff to political friends. Worked like a charm.
the one thing the NYT prints that’s worthwhile are their crossword puzzles
At least the NYT still gets to go to bed every night.
The CBO analysis already settled this, New York Times. It is a drag on the economy and the added debt will continue to drag it down as interest continues to accumulate from this - adding more to the red side of the balance sheet for generations.
We did not get back the money that was spent on this as a return on investment - the overwhelming majority of it was not for infrastructure improvements but for junk and to increase the baseline of already existing social programs.
Good news and bad news.
Bad news is the bailout leaves 90million people out of work.
Good news is that 40% of the NYSlimes reporting and editorial workforce is out of work.
About as much as Catherine Zeta-Jones is able to stimulate Richard Simmons.
LOL! But, oddly enough, none of those 1.6 million were at The New York Times.
HufferPo: NY Times Layoffs Painful But Necessary
New York Times editor Jill Abramson said in an interview on Wednesday that the recent buyouts and layoffs that hit her paper were "painful" but necessary. The Times shed about 30 staffers in its latest round of job cuts, including several very senior editors who had been with the paper for decades. Reports at the time indicated that Abramson was trying to push through a major reform of the Times' masthead. Speaking to Capital New York's Joe Pompeo, Abramson essentially confirmed this narrative, saying that there were simply too many cooks in the kitchen. "Some of the top jobs in the newsroom we sort of could no longer afford," she said.
The so-called "stimulus" scuttled the economic recovery.
They don’t need writers in the MSM, the White House and DNC provide their articles for them.
Yeah, it worked all right.............
It took the DOW from the 8,000 range all the way up to 16,000 range with very little backing it and driven us to the brink of inflation. It's a wonder we haven't imploded yet.
I thought it was Obamacare that saved the economy. I’m confused.
NY Times: The Stimulus worked!
Except for the millions of Americans that are no longer in the workforce. Except for the hundreds of thousands that lost full time jobs and had them replaced with part time jobs. Except for the thousands of small business that have closed.
If you think the NY Times cares about you, you need a clue.. They work for Obama and the DNC............
Is that why the nation is in such great shape? A national debt so high it cannot be repaid, more people out of work than ever before, a government that is so big it consumes most of taxes collected, a government that is slowly but surely destroying the middle class, a government the is so controlling and invasive it prevents the private sector from doing its job of creating new companies and new jobs. That does sound like whatever happened made things better. Where are you living? Which country?
Methinks $832 billion in tax cuts would have done a much better job. But, nope, the Marxist knew better how to spend that money.
It created or saved 1.6 million jobs. Just once I’d like to see a republican who knows how to argue. Simply ask “How many were created and how many were saved?”