They didn’t judge shop very well, apparently.
Judge Greer is a good judge.
There is only one real reason they object to voter ID laws: It makes it more difficult for them to steal elections........................
- With the US Senate seriously up for grabs and cash this November - the progressive judiciary (even SCROTUS) is realizing that any or all of them could be impeached and removed and might have to use tanning lotion and find an 108% Obamabot district to run for Congress as the Chocolate idiot from Florida had to do…..
All that the Supreme Court had to say to justify its decision in Crawford v. Marion is the following. The states have amended the Constitution to protect voting rights only on the basis of race, sex, tax status and age as evidenced by the 15th, 19th, 24th and 26th Amendments. In other words, the states have never amended the Constitution to make not having to show a valid photo ID in order to vote a right. But post-FDR era justices are evidently determined to leave the Constitution out of the discussion.
I know they need a phot ID law in Florida to stop all the vacationing New Yorkers from voting in Florida elections.
The judge is completely right, in that a legislature shouldn’t have to wait for proof of wide-spread corruption (that probably already existsm but thanks to the corruption will never be “proven”) to enact legislation that protects the electoral process.
Claiming that this is a “solution in search of a problem” is sort of like ridiculing a home owner for locking the doors and windows unless the home has already been robbed... Or for owning a fire extinguisher unless you’ve already had a fire.
