Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I’ll spell it out for our resident aviation geniuses here on FR since it’s apparent there is a basic lack of understanding...

The “basic” design, of which the current model is representative of, is over 50 years old. I concede a point that I don’t recall ever debating, but apparently I somehow did?...however, if you look at the link in post 39, you might find something that clearly shows the aircraft this article is referring to are anything but.

The article “claims” the U2 is over 50 years old. I refute that because, although the current is similar in appearance to the former, they are, in no other fashion related.

So you geniuses can now get back to your “debate”...or posting rebuttals or whatever...I’m done.


66 posted on 02/25/2014 3:00:57 PM PST by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: SZonian

The design, a single engine sailplane, was from the 50’s but I agree with you, the TR-1/U2S is not my grandpa’s U2A.

Don’t let them get you down! LOL!

(I did weather support for the U2s at Alconbury and Beale.)


95 posted on 02/25/2014 4:47:33 PM PST by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson