Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SZonian

A lot of people don’t understand. Just because something was first built in some year doesn’t mean something with the same basic airframe couldn’t be built decades later.

The C-130 is a prime example.


71 posted on 02/25/2014 3:15:55 PM PST by rlmorel ("A nation, despicable by its weakness, forfeits even the privilege of being neutral." A. Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: rlmorel

Yes...I hope I clarified that point in post 66


73 posted on 02/25/2014 3:20:34 PM PST by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel

Yes, what Szonian is saying is that while the airframe design dates to the 1950s the aircraft currently still in service were actually new build airframes in the 1980s. Totally newly manufactured aircraft updated and call the TR1 at that point and time.

So, the design is 60+/- years old but the current aircraft are about half that age.


75 posted on 02/25/2014 3:22:35 PM PST by FAA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson