Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sources: Brewer Will Veto Gay Discrimination Law
http://www.newsmax.com ^ | FHebruary 25, 2014 | Drew MacKenzie

Posted on 02/25/2014 2:59:04 PM PST by NKP_Vet

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer will veto a controversial bill that would allow business owners to refuse service to gays and lesbians on the grounds of their religious conviction, NBC News is reporting via Twitter.

More: Brewer "doesn't want to take any actions that could jeopardize the economic momentum" in Arizona, source says

How 1 Free Guide Saved This American's Retirement Home | Newsfront Tags: Gay Marriage | Arizona | gay | discrimination | Jan Brewer Sources: Brewer Will Veto Gay Discrimination Law

Tuesday, 25 Feb 2014 01:29 PM

By Drew MacKenzie Share: A A | Email Us | Print | Forward Article | Get Short Link Copy Shortlink

0 inShare

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer will veto a controversial bill that would allow business owners to refuse service to gays and lesbians on the grounds of their religious conviction, NBC News is reporting via Twitter.

Brewer has been under intense pressure from business groups and political leaders to diffuse the situation and veto the legislation which they fear will draw unnecessary attention to Arizona a year before it hosts the next Super Bowl and following economic losses on controversial immigration stances.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: antichristianbigotry; az2014; brewer; homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: NKP_Vet; a fool in paradise

Evidently, the deep sea fishing industry has threatened to move out of Arizona.


61 posted on 02/25/2014 5:34:48 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious! We reserve the right to serve refuse to anyone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet; a fool in paradise

Evidently, the deep sea fishing industry has threatened to move out of Arizona.


62 posted on 02/25/2014 5:34:49 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious! We reserve the right to serve refuse to anyone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

brewer thinks, ‘you righties made me sign immigration, 2nd amendement, late term abortion. now its my turn to be my moderate self.’


63 posted on 02/25/2014 6:07:33 PM PST by yongin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

I am pondering which conservatives, if in the same position as Jan Brewer, would sign this into law. Frankly, I see many of them caving.

Who would stand up to the homosexual mafia? I think Michelle Bachmann would. Would Ted Cruz? Rand Paul? Rubio? Would Alan West? Ben Carson? Would Sarah Palin? I really would like to know who would have that kind of strength.


64 posted on 02/25/2014 6:09:02 PM PST by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

The gays have America by the balls.


65 posted on 02/25/2014 6:10:30 PM PST by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I cannot think of a name

Funny you never you use that on men.


66 posted on 02/25/2014 6:16:30 PM PST by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada

“I think Michelle Bachmann would. Would Ted Cruz? Rand Paul? Rubio? Would Alan West? Ben Carson? Would Sarah Palin? I really would like to know who would have that kind of strength”

All the above but Rand Paul. He is too “libertarian” like his old man, who voted to lift DADT. He’s wishy washy on marriage and never puts faith into the conversation when asked. He will say it should be left up to the states to define, but will not mention God’s plan for man and woman.


67 posted on 02/25/2014 6:19:40 PM PST by NKP_Vet (“From man’s sweat and God’s love, beer came into the world.” – St. Arnold of Metz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: struggle

You are correct.


68 posted on 02/25/2014 6:24:03 PM PST by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

“...52 electoral votes...”

All because of LBJ’s daisy-picking campaign ad. People were much more easily fooled in those days........oh, wait...


69 posted on 02/25/2014 6:25:51 PM PST by beelzepug (if any alphabets are watchin', I'll be coming home right after the meetin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

I didn’t say sodomites were cool.

I just have some questions about attitudes toward gays.


70 posted on 02/25/2014 6:27:04 PM PST by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

“...Goldwater would have failed it.”

Not so sure. Some of these “social” issues today were not even been on the radar in 1964.


71 posted on 02/25/2014 6:34:42 PM PST by beelzepug (if any alphabets are watchin', I'll be coming home right after the meetin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada

That’s a good question. Are there any states that have already passed similar laws? If not I reckon we will see if any really conservative state gets a law like this passed. Not that it will probably last two seconds with our black robed masters.

Freegards


72 posted on 02/25/2014 6:36:07 PM PST by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Ransomed

“no shoes, no shirt, no service” is banned?


73 posted on 02/25/2014 6:37:10 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

The ongoing arguments about the shirt deficient and shoe deprived aren’t being framed as being about ‘civil rights.’ So they are out of luck, and ‘no shirt, no shoes, no dice’ is therefore the law of the land.

Freegards


74 posted on 02/25/2014 6:44:44 PM PST by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

True liberty minded Republicans and Libertarians believe in freedom of association and letting the free market work.


75 posted on 02/25/2014 6:54:10 PM PST by DLfromthedesert (She accomplished nothing: should have stayed at home and baked cookies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Ransomed

lol


76 posted on 02/25/2014 7:00:05 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Ransomed

heh


77 posted on 02/25/2014 7:00:41 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
Like most posters here, I think the court rulings in states about wedding cakes, performing weddings, etc. are CRAZY.

At the same time, this particular bill is too broad and too vague.

78 posted on 02/25/2014 7:25:33 PM PST by JustTheTruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
So she will put party and politics over the word of God.....the except same thing 99% of worthless republicans do every day of the week.

"worthless republicans"? Good job throwing the blame on the peons. Where is the Pope on this? Where is the President of the Southern Baptist Convention on this?

*crickets*

79 posted on 02/25/2014 9:07:11 PM PST by houeto (We intend to liberate Democrats from the dreaded Job-Lock this November!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

No surprise.

1. A whole bunch of prominent Republicans including Gingrich, Romney, McCain, and the other Arizona Senator came out against it. Several former supporters of the bill backtracked and on paper it would not pass today. Also almost nobody came out in favor of the bill. Palin? Cruz (great on the issue but never came out to support this particular bill as far as I know)?

2. Add to that the massive onslaught from the media.

3. Massive pressure from dozens of major corporations that signed a huge petition against this, the chamber of commerce oppose, and even the NFL threatened to move Super Bowl! The last is a painful memory, Arizona had a Super Bowl moved from the state 20 years ago over its resistance to MLK holiday.

Who is to blame? The voters, for voting in RINO’s (McCain) and supporting immoral corporations.


80 posted on 02/25/2014 9:24:04 PM PST by BurningOak (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2830849/reply?c=1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson