If the main issue is whether or not this current Arizona law passes constitutional muster, we both agree that it does.
I do take issue with saying that discriminating against a person purely based on his race or ethnicity is not a big deal. It is in my book. It is objectively, really MORALLY WRONG. I will be very surprised if you disagreed with me on this.
But I don’t want government involved in it.
Its amazing how Morality as defined by the homosexual community has evolved over time:
1) first it was immoral unless you tolerated the Gay-lifestyle,
2) then it was immoral unless you accepted it,
3) and then it was immoral unless you approved it,
4) and now it seems, it is immoral unless you endorse it,
5) what will be next, it will be considered immoral unless you practice it?