I’m not sure I understand where religion comes into this. Why is the baker REQUIRED to serve anyone at all? Is a wedding cake from the baker of your choice now a fundamental right under the Constitution? The baker is not free in this scenario.
The baker made the religious argument (it is a California case and has already been litigated). The baker agreed to bake a wedding cake UNTIL the baker found out that the couple was homosexual, then refused.
Do I think the case was a set up. Of course. That is the way the left works. Our reaction to it by trying to legislate always back fires.
The baker is not ‘free’ in any case. He cannot refuse to sell cakes to those he dislikes just because he dislikes them. I will sell bread to you but not him. The baker has already gotten business licenses and health inspections and all sorts of other government permission.
“Is a wedding cake from the baker of your choice now a fundamental right under the Constitution” I never made that claim. It is silliness to make that type of jump but no doubt it is coming.