The balance of the regular and traditional population can be disturbed by those who have but little to offer. There is nothing but further misery and strife to be expected. Sure, a very small number can be and are assimilated into any country. The do good variety of multi-culturalists are only too ready to bad mouth any objectors to the change in their once quiet neighborhood. The do gooders do not wish to entertain those undesirable newcomers in their district however. The high income houses are usually not accessible to
Italy has been hard hit by illegals and the tragic accounts of drownings in leaking vessels are well known. Now the island of Lampedusa has been selected as a holding point for illegals from Africa. I have done some amount of reading of what this means. First of all, the mainland of Italy is now spared the problem of persons silently disappearing into the interior. Small riots have occurred by dissatisfied illegals who want all the good things quickly.
What of the 5000 residents of Lampedusa? Their lives have been drastically changed. Women dare not go out alone in the evening. Persons come back to their houses and find the illegals boldly in their kitchen, helping themselves.
The Australians have used an island called Christmas Island to put illegal immigrants in hastily constructed housing.
Excuse the rant, but the established and mainly hardworking nations do have a problem.
Their high income houses are usually not accessible to poor unskilled illegals.
“What the NYT should do is to do an in depth study of the ramifications of unchecked illegal entry to a sovereign country.”
I’m not certain that anyone at the times would make a cogent connection.
The Australians are doing it exactly right by putting these asylum seekers (90% are Muzz) on Christmas Island and never allowing them into Australia proper