Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/01/2014 2:42:36 PM PST by Clintonfatigued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Impy; GOPsterinMA; randita; Sun; LdSentinal; ExTexasRedhead; ...

Does anyone remember that 1988 Bush television commercial, the one showing prisoners entering & leaving prison through a revolving door?


2 posted on 03/01/2014 2:44:03 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (The War on Drugs is Big Government statism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

>> Political experts say barring ex-felons from voting impacts African Americans disproportionately.

I wonder what the victims think.


3 posted on 03/01/2014 2:44:59 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clintonfatigued

Suppose just a stretch in prison doesn’t pay “the debt to society”? Suppose some us of believe that there are other consequences, including forfeiting one’s right to vote?


4 posted on 03/01/2014 2:45:37 PM PST by clintonh8r (Don't twerk me, Broi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clintonfatigued

Fine, as long as all rights are restored, vote, office, firearms ownership etc etc.

Permanent disenfranchisement is a crime, denying even the most non-violent felons little recourse to defend their lives from violent assault with meaningful tools commonly in use.

If they are dangerous criminals, they should not walk among us; incarcerate or terminate, but not re-integrate, the numbers tell us why.


5 posted on 03/01/2014 2:46:47 PM PST by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clintonfatigued
If they are finished paying their debt to society then, by all means, give them their right to vote back. At the same time, give them their right to bear arms back.

On the other hand, if they are too dangerous to have their second amendment freedoms back, then they are too dangerous to have the vote back and they are too dangerous to be let out of prison.

7 posted on 03/01/2014 2:49:05 PM PST by Washi (Stop Obama's War On Jobs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clintonfatigued

ENOUGH of this racist puke.

where does the law mention RACE?

too many blacks in prison? not enough Jews on the NBA or doing Rap “music”

RAP “Music EQUITY for Jews Now!!

Give The DEAD the VOTE!!


9 posted on 03/01/2014 2:53:43 PM PST by MeshugeMikey (how many times has obie fundamentaly transformed obamacare now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clintonfatigued
What is an ex-felon? Is that someone that a felon that has been cleard?
10 posted on 03/01/2014 2:56:27 PM PST by mountainlion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clintonfatigued
Warner suggested imposing a higher threshold for violent ex-felons to regain voting rights.

One presumes that Mister Warner is LYING in order to make fence-sitting VA voters think that he is anything but in the Dem tank for felons voting (early, often, and from the big house.)

Felons and illegal aliens...Dems keep some interesting company, eh?

.

12 posted on 03/01/2014 3:05:41 PM PST by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clintonfatigued

This would be an interesting experiment: Poll convicted felons and ask if they would rather give up their Bill of Rights protections or be incarcerated and have their rights remain intact. (Assuming they’d have to give up 2A, at least during incarceration.)


15 posted on 03/01/2014 3:09:23 PM PST by clintonh8r (Don't twerk me, Broi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clintonfatigued
Liberal Democrats who are not facing tough re-elections this year say it’s the right thing to do, but vulnerable incumbents are steering clear of the proposal.

Amazing how that works every six years, isn't it?

Two words: term limits.

20 posted on 03/01/2014 3:12:53 PM PST by Albion Wilde (The less a man knows, the more certain he is that he knows it all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clintonfatigued

RATs must be unable to dig up enough dead voters, ya think?


27 posted on 03/01/2014 3:24:11 PM PST by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clintonfatigued

Yes those decided democrats. Like like those decided democrats that voted enmasse for Obama are and every other Freedom destroying law they care to pass. The only thing that decides democrats od their room assignments in hell!


35 posted on 03/01/2014 3:48:53 PM PST by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clintonfatigued; All
"Holder's call to let ex-felons vote
divides Senate Democrats"


 photo 60badffa8eedec0989f43985.jpg

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


39 posted on 03/01/2014 3:54:49 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clintonfatigued

Perhaps a compromise for the non-violent felons (violent ones who have unjustifiably taken life, significant amounts of property, and who have invaded peoples’ homes/businesses should be barred forever) if a “truth in sentencing” requirement is included. 20 years MEANS 20 years, or no vote.


45 posted on 03/01/2014 4:32:40 PM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clintonfatigued; MeshugeMikey; ExTexasRedhead; patriot08; Marcella; RitaOK; Texas Fossil; ...
This issue of whether felons should be allowed to vote has always been a matter of state law. Does Holder now advocate that there be a federal statute which mandates that all states allow felons (presumably only those who are not currently imprisoned) to vote? If so, it would seem to be yet another attack on the Tenth Amendment.

Of course, the real reasons he wants to see felons voting NOW are that (1) the majority of them would likely vote for the 'Rats and (2) the 'Rats are desperate for votes - legal or illegal - in November's midterm elections, where they see themselves in deep trouble.

48 posted on 03/01/2014 5:08:37 PM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson