Please click the link above to contribute by secure server or by mail to:
Free Republic - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Make it a monthly if you can.
Keep freedom ALIVE!!
Thank you all very much!!
God bless.
GIT-R-DONE!
Make Today, Day 61 the day!
Posted on 03/02/2014 12:00:12 PM PST by Kaslin
We are all guilty of providing a wide leeway to a politician that we favor. If the politician is someone we support, we restrain ourselves when something becomes public that would have us in a tizzy if done by someone with whom we dislike politically. That is referred to as “cutting someone some slack.” But there is a limit for everyone like there was for Anthony Weiner or Larry Craig. When will the grownups in the Democratic Party say enough is enough with Barack Obama?
We know that he is your guy. We also know that after 2010 there are virtually no moderate Democrats in the House as almost all the Blue Dogs were wiped out, leaving the caucus consisting of almost all liberals or leftists. We also know that the Democratic Senators have ceded virtually all control of their caucus to Harry Reid who has become a Senate of One.
Yet the latest move by the Obama Administration has got to scare the daylights out of any American. The proposal by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to do a “study” of newsrooms and place people from the commission in the newsroom asking questions about editorial content and the decision-making process makes McCarthy tactics look tame. Fortunately, the largely dormant press that has licked the behind of President Obama in an adoring fashion for over five years rose up to force a withdrawal of this proposal. Whether it is a termination of the tactic or just a regrouping is yet to be seen. However you look at it, the move was the single most oppressive attempt by the government to stifle the first amendment in a non-wartime period in our history.
This comes on the heels of one of the worst cases of Presidential overreach in our history. The episode of the IRS suppressing and harassing groups applying for 501(c) 4 status remains a blight upon the Obama Administration. This column stated when the story broke that every American should be scared by the abusive use of the IRS to attack political enemies and political free speech. We stated that if it were allowed to go unrebuked by Congress, in the future the tables could be turned and the same tactics could be used against Democrats –- so why weren’t the Democrats screaming?
If ever there was any doubt of the guilt of the Administration in this matter, they recently confirmed that guilt themselves. Their making public an attempt to rewrite the law through IRS regulations that would, in effect, eliminate 501(c) 4 entities was a brazen attempt to institutionalize what they had attempted to do surreptiously. Fortunately some elements of the left have taken a stand against this power grab. The ACLU submitted a 26-page rebuttal of the position, calling the advocacy done by the entities “the heart of our representative democracy.” Even the most left-wing of unions, the SEIU, staked a position against the proposed Obama Administration regulations as they fear the restrictions adopted could then be spread to 501(c)5 organizations (unions) or 501(c)6 organizations (trade associations). At least some of Mr. Obama’s base has gained clarity about his subversive tactics.
Where is the leadership of the Democrats in Congress as the President expands executive authority to new levels? Obama’s single-handed rewriting of the Affordable Care Act should make them shutter. First of all, the Democrats in Congress wrote the act so you would think they might not want to have another branch of government gutting it. Second, you might think they would be worried about the tactics employed by Obama that would give justification to the next Republican president (there will be one and not soon enough) to alter any law that a president takes a dislike to and wants to change.
Yet when the President came to their turf to deliver the State of the Union address, not only were the Democrats docile, they were downright compliant. A president of the United States dared to speak to the legislative branch and tell them he was going to change the laws they are in charge of creating by the Constitution. The Democrats not only did not slap him down for co-opting their powers, they give him a standing ovation. One could conclude they had lost their collective minds.
When a prior president went too far, a group of Republican elders went to him and told him it was time to go and he went. Though the situation has not reached the same 1974 crisis point, it is seriously worrisome. The use of various arms of the government to harass citizens and suppress the first amendment is the most egregious misuse of power by any Chief Executive.
It is time for Democrats to stand and say no more. If you don’t do it now there could be permanent harm to our democracy. Certainly some of you will no longer be in office come this November because the American people will certainly say enough is enough.
For the moment, the ideological heirs of those that believe the flames of liberty must be extinguished and the aspirations of the individual curtailed for the alleged good of humanity have grown more sophisticated in their methods of getting the people to comply with their agenda. However, as Americans draw ever closer to the breaking point of just how much they are willing to put up with as frankly we are fast approaching the threshold where there is precious little left for the state to steal, we must ask with concern: will the aspiring despots among us resort to the violent tendencies of their philosophical progenitors in the attempt to bring about socialism’s ultimate triumph?
-Fredrick Meekins
“..The rats will take everything they can, plus more...”
You are so correct. This is NOT the democratic party of your grand-dad or dad, and it’s certainly not the party of JFK. It is pure evil and communist. We call them “The Walking Democrats”. Totally useless, they feed of the productive and the living while destroying everything in their path. Probably the only thing they’re good for, is target practice....they are NOT American.
I have no scientific data to back this up. Purely from observational intuition I have concluded that people that cling to voting for democrats are genetically predisposed to be slaves. It just feels right to them down to their DNA. Much like most here feel the need to be free to their core. They can forgive the most hideous actions and most egregious statement as long as they are treated to something they perceive as free. It’s the only explanation I can conceive.
I’ve known some Cali dems that seemed reasonable on the surface, only to show their true socialist leanings as I got to know them better. One even referred to his own mother as a “rabid democrat” as if that wasn’t a bad thing.
Of course I’ve severed ties. One still owes me money but I’m fine with not collecting as long as there’s no attempt at contacting me in the future.
The author is deluded.
Nixon left something to be desired, but he was a saint when compared to Obama.
Nixon had flaws, but he was patriotic and pro American.
Barack Obama’s presidency is taking the Democratic Party down. The question is, when will they realize that it’s him or them?
Everyone would be happier if the counties had most of the tax, spend, and law making authority. The values of low population density voters are very different than high density which leads to all the political warfare. Let the city socialists destroy themselves with high taxes and regulation and let traditional Americans live free.
Obama’s single-handed rewriting of the Affordable Care Act should make them shutter.
####################################################
I wondered what covering the windows had to do with anything
“It’s time for the Democrats to stand and say no more.”
Why?
Democrats in government love it, Democrats in the electorate love it.
Why stop something that Democrats want, especially when they have the power, which they love exceedingly.
(There isn’t an American among them.)
Just asking.
IMHO
Off hand, who would they be? Some obscure congressman from northwestern Minnesota? The last senator I knew who fit that description was Zell Miller and he retired sometime during the last decade.
TOTALITARIANS: How many will you kill? (low information voter shrugs)
“With regard to those Americans who might refuse to embrace communism, Ayers and his comrades — including Bernardine Dohrn, Mark Rudd, Linda Evans, Jeff Jones, and numerous others — proposed that such resisters should be sent to reeducation camps and killed. The terrorists estimated that it would be necessary to eliminate some 25 million people in this fashion, so as to advance the revolution.”
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2169
It is tempting to say OK when an R gets into office then he can eliminate the capital gains tax and reduce the corporate tax to 15% like Canada's. How would they stop him?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.