Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US net imports down, exports soar; just another day at the office
Platts ^ | March 1, 2014 | John Kingston

Posted on 03/02/2014 3:08:32 PM PST by thackney

A few eye-popping numbers were in the EIA monthly report on US oil use in December. It shows the shale gale in full bloom.

US total net imports were 5.057 million b/d. That’s down about 1 million b/d from a year ago. It’s down about 3.4 million b/d from three years ago. It’s down more than 8 million b/d from the all-time high of 13.354 million b/d in October 2005. It’s easily the lowest in the post-shale era.

Take away the Canadian net import figure of 2.602 million b/d, and you’re dealing with what might be called “at-risk” net import dependence of just under 2.5 million b/d. That’s in a country that had “products supplied” of 19.081 million b/d in December, up about 1 million b/d from the end of 2012. So US net import dependence continues to slide, and demand continues to rise.

Crude exports were 190,000 b/d, all of it to Canada. It’s a healthy number, but it isn’t a record.

Total exports of all crude and products were a staggering 4.44 million b/d. Three years ago, they were almost 2 million b/d less than that. The figure for December is a record, by almost half a million barrels per day. The US exported more petroleum products than all but three countries in the world–Saudi Arabia, Russia and the US itself–actually produce in the form of crude.

What’s interesting about the export figure are the smaller areas of exports, not the big categories that have steadily driven US exports over the past few years. Total distillate exports of 1.232 million b/d were less than the July record figure of 1.383 million b/d; gasoline exports of 576,000 b/d were close to a record. But the US exported record amounts of gasoline blending components (192,000 b/d, previous record 141,000 b/d a month earlier); special naphthas (250,000 b/d; it had never even been six figures before, and some analysts have been predicting for awhile that changes in the gravity of the average barrel, combined with the ethane glut, was going to lead to the US being extremely long naphtha); and petroleum coke, one of the highest ever at 577,000 b/d.

Refinery runs cranked away at 92%. That’s not surprising; the US exported 4.254 million b/d of products, and you can’t do that unless your refineries are operating at a high level. The run rate isn’t a record–there have been a few times in history where it exceeded 95%–but it is clearly on the high side. It’s the highest rate for a December since 2004. For the year, US refineries ran on average at 88.3%, just a touch more than a 10-year average run rate that was slightly less than 88%.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; oil; refinery

1 posted on 03/02/2014 3:08:32 PM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

So we’re just a hair below true “energy independence”?, the vaunted goal lo these many years? And it’s because of fracking technologies? IOW the free markets found a solution while all the gubbermint did was make things harder?

CC


2 posted on 03/02/2014 3:15:12 PM PST by Celtic Conservative (tease not the dragon for thou art crunchy when roasted and taste good with ketchup)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative

Build the Keystone pipeline and another 650,000 b/d moves out of the “at risk” column.


3 posted on 03/02/2014 3:27:35 PM PST by Former Proud Canadian (Cruz/Palin 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative

5 million barrels per day is a pretty thick hair.


4 posted on 03/02/2014 3:31:35 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney

True enough, but we’re already at the level where we have no true strategic energy vulnerability to non-Canadian foreign powers. They could totally cut us off and we’d need to do a bit of rationing for the year or so that it would take for increased gas drilling (many gas projects have been idled due to low gas prices) and some coal-to-gas and coal-to-liquids projects to end the need even for that.


5 posted on 03/02/2014 3:38:58 PM PST by only1percent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Sounds like our refineries, and Canada’s, are keepng up with field production. Or am I reading this wrong?
I thought our refining capacity was very limited.


6 posted on 03/02/2014 3:42:32 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Less than $2.7k to go!!

Make Today, Day 61 the day!

7 posted on 03/02/2014 3:50:29 PM PST by RedMDer (May we always be happy and may our enemies always know it. - Sarah Palin, 10-18-2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

True oil independence, at least at the North America level is in sight; in our lifetimes.

Something I never thought possible as recently as 2007.


8 posted on 03/02/2014 3:57:01 PM PST by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

wtf is b/d


9 posted on 03/02/2014 4:34:20 PM PST by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

We refine nearly twice as much oil as we produce domestically. It is why we are importing almost as much crude oil as we produce ourselves.

We refine more oil than we use ourselves. We import a little more than we need and export the surplus for a benefit to trade balance, keeping more jobs and refinery capacity in the states.

We haven’t built a new major refinery in quite a while, but we spent the last couple decades expanding and upgrading the ones we have.

Data at:

Crude Oil Production
http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_crd_crpdn_adc_mbblpd_m.htm

U.S. Refiner Net Input of Crude Oil
http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=WCRRIUS2&f=4

U.S. Imports of Crude Oil
http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=MCRIMUS2&f=M


10 posted on 03/02/2014 4:46:44 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

barrels per day, normal measurement of oil production/movement/processing


11 posted on 03/02/2014 4:47:31 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thackney

So the exports were;

1. Jobs

2. Drug money

3. Money from the illegals

4. Manufacturing knowledge

5. Raw materials

6. Unprocessed food

7. Horses for slaughter

8. Things to be printed then shipped back for sale

9. Weapons to cartels

10. Stolen high priced cars


12 posted on 03/02/2014 5:18:26 PM PST by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: only1percent
There should be 700 million barrels in the SPR. Build Keystone and the SPR should be able to handle the balance of the shortfall for at least a year.

If a real crisis arrived, a crash drilling program (the drill, drill, drill option) should be able to bridge the gap in a short time.

By that measure, North America has achieved energy independence.

13 posted on 03/03/2014 5:34:15 AM PST by Former Proud Canadian (Cruz/Palin 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson