To: andyk
They already do swat raids in numerous other states in the NE for improperly registered firearms. Why wouldn’t they do it this case?
23 posted on
03/02/2014 7:09:51 PM PST by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: driftdiver
Good point. Now that I think about it, they also do raids in CA if you have registered and become “ineligible”. I stand corrected and even more disturbed.
26 posted on
03/02/2014 7:13:46 PM PST by
andyk
(I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
To: driftdiver
I’m torn. The people after whom they would be going are of a different number, a different mindset, motivation, etc, than folks who are currently the target of confiscatory raids. We have seen that we’re no longer a nation of laws, but men, so I have to think the statists consider that when they order their JBTs to do their bidding.
54 posted on
03/02/2014 7:35:53 PM PST by
andyk
(I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
To: driftdiver
"They already do swat raids in numerous other states in the NE for improperly registered firearms. Why wouldn’t they do it this case?"
Because they have no way of knowing WHO owns a banned rifle - except, of course, for the ones that registered.
214 posted on
03/03/2014 4:04:29 AM PST by
Psalm 73
("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson